Qualifications of Crown Officers

AuthorityCabinet Office
Date received2019-03-18
OutcomeAll information sent
Outcome date2019-04-03
Case ID769065

Summary

The request sought details on character checks and moral standards for Crown Officer appointments in the Isle of Man. The Cabinet Office disclosed that a well-established process exists involving criminal conviction declarations, character references, and adherence to integrity and impartiality standards.

Key Facts

  • Candidates must declare any previous criminal convictions as part of the application process.
  • Pre-appointment checks principally involve obtaining character references from nominated referees.
  • Candidates must demonstrate they act with integrity and ensure fairness and impartiality.
  • Personal standards require conduct consistent with the authority of the appointment and minimizing conflict or embarrassment.
  • Judicial appointees are subject to the Code of Conduct for Members of the Judiciary and must swear an oath.

Data Disclosed

  • 2019-03-18
  • 2019-04-03
  • 769065
  • 3
  • 1
  • IM1 3PN
  • 01624 686244

Original Request

Prior to recommendation for appointment of a person to a Crown Officer position, what investigations or checks are made respecting the character and prior behaviour of potential appointees? Are there in fact any moral or personal standards for such appointments, and if so what are they? Please note that these questions are directed in general, and are not specific to any particular appointment or individual holding such position, whether historical or present.

Data Tables (5)

In terms of the moral and personal s tandards for Crown appointments, candidates
must demonstrate that they act with integrity and work to ensure fairness and
impartiality. The s election panel for Crown appointment s builds a picture of a
candidate's character and suitability for th e post b y assessing the application
information and C V when shortlistin g, and by asking relevant questions during
interview . Pre-appointment checks are conducte d on candidates who are being
recommended for appointment. This principally in volves obtaining character references
from the nominated r eferees. Depending on the nature of th e appointment, the
panel's recommendation is then r eferred t o either Her Majesty The Queen or His
Excellency th e Lieutenant Governor f or approval.
The personal standards e xpected of Crown appointee s are covered in the terms and
conditions for service . T his i ncludes ensuring conduct is of a manner consistent with
the authority and standin g of the appointment an d co nducting private affairs so as to
minimise t he possibility o f conflic t or embarrassment.
Crown appointee s to judicial position s are subject to t he Code of Conduct for Members
of t he Judiciary, whic h is aligned to i nternational standards regarding the ethical
conduc t o f judge
Members of t he j udiciary are also required to swear a n oat h before taking up office,
while p rocedures are in p lace to dea l with any complaint s i n respec t o f an individual's
conduc t o r performance.

Full Response Text

Government Office Douglas Isle of Man IM1 3PN Telephone: (+44) 01624 686244 Website: www.gov.im/co

Our ref: 769065 3 April 2019

Dear ###

We write further to your request which was received on 18 March 2019 and which states:

"Prior to recommendation for appointment of a person to a Crown Officer position, what investigations or checks are made respecting the character and prior behaviour of potential appointees? Are there in fact any moral or personal standards for such appointments, and if so what are they? Please note that these questions are directed in general, and are not specific to any particular appointment or individual holding such position, whether historical or present."

I have detailed below the information that is being released to you. Our response to your request is as follows:

Prior to recommendation for appointment of a person to a Crown Officer position, what investigations or checks are made respecting the character and prior behaviour of potential appointees? A well-established process is in place in respect of Crown appointments. The person specification for all advertised positions sets out the essential attributes required by candidates in respect of qualifications, experience, knowledge and skills and personal qualities. There is also a requirement to declare any previous criminal convictions as part of the application process. Are there in fact any moral or personal standards for such appointments, and if so what are they? In terms of the moral and personal standards for Crown appointments, candidates must demonstrate that they act with integrity and work to ensure fairness and impartiality. The selection panel for Crown appointments builds a picture of a candidate's character and suitability for the post by assessing the application information and CV when shortlisting, and by asking relevant questions during interview. Pre-appointment checks are conducted on candidates who are being recommended for appointment. This principally involves obtaining character references from the nominated referees. Depending on the nature of the appointment, the

panel's recommendation is then referred to either Her Majesty The Queen or His Excellency the Lieutenant Governor for approval. The personal standards expected of Crown appointees are covered in the terms and conditions for service. This includes ensuring conduct is of a manner consistent with the authority and standing of the appointment and conducting private affairs so as to minimise the possibility of conflict or embarrassment. Crown appointees to judicial positions are subject to the Code of Conduct for Members of the Judiciary, which is aligned to international standards regarding the ethical conduct of judges. Members of the judiciary are also required to swear an oath before taking up office, while procedures are in place to deal with any complaints in respect of an individual's conduct or performance.

Please quote the reference number 769065 in any future communications.

Your right to request a review

If you are unhappy with this response to your freedom of information request, you may ask us to carry out an internal review of the response, by completing a complaint form and submitting it electronically or by delivery/post.

An electronic version of our complaint form can be found by going to our website at https://services.gov.im/freedom-of-information/Review . If you would like a paper version of our complaint form to be sent to you by post, please contact me and I will be happy to arrange for this. Your review request should explain why you are dissatisfied with this response, and should be made as soon as practicable. We will respond as soon as the review has been concluded. If you are not satisfied with the result of the review, you then have the right to appeal to the Information Commissioner for a decision on; 1. Whether we have responded to your request for information in accordance with Part 2 of the Freedom of Information Act 2015; or 2. Whether we are justified in refusing to give you the information requested.
In response to an application for review, the Information Commissioner may, at any time, attempt to resolve a matter by negotiation, conciliation, mediation or another form of alternative dispute resolution and will have regard to any outcome of this in making any subsequent decision. More detailed information on your right to a review can be found on the Information Commissioner’s website at www.inforights.im. Should you have any queries concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Further information about freedom of information requests can be found at www.gov.im/foi.

I will now close your request as of this date.

Yours sincerely