Contracted UDA's and provider performances

AuthorityDepartment of Health and Social Care
Date received2018-03-13
OutcomeAll information sent
Outcome date2018-04-06
Case ID362737

Original Request

Question 01: For the contract year 2016-2017; the number of contracted UDA's for each provider, the number of completed UDA's for each provider and the percentage achievement for each contract. Question 02: For the contract year 2015-2016; the number of contracted UDA's for each provider, the number of completed UDA's for each provider and the percentage achievement for each contract. Question 03: Which providers received special circumstances as a one off agreement against the required financial reimbursement mentioned in FOIA/DHSC/rvsd/01 and the value of reimbursement involved that was set aside in each case. Question 04: In a FOI request dated around the 18/11/17 relating to a number of dental uda issues, the response to question 4 did not include a provider practice under this heading of either Westview Peel and/or Regent Dental Peel in relation to contract UDA achievement 2016-2017.

Data Tables (3)

Provider & Practice Contracted UDAs Completed UDAs % of UDAs Achieved Year-End Agreement between the Department and the Provider
V Tsivos / V Loli Port Erin Dental Practice 24,811.00 24,090.60 97% Provider carried forward the shortfall of 3% to be achieved in the following financial year (2016-2017)
S Du Toit Thie Rosien Dental Practice
JH Van Rooyen / A Lewis 65 Woodbourne Road Dental Practice 16,655.00 17,411.60 105% N/A
JH Van Rooyen / A Vogelzang Westview Dental Practices (Douglas & Peel)
T Bell The Tracey Bell Clinic 750.00 855.20 114% N/A
M Ray / I Ravat Ravat & Ray Dental Practice
A Gibb Grove Mount Dental Practice 200.00 57.20 28.6% Provider reimbursed full amount of shortfall to the Department
G Hill Grove Mount Dental Practice
A Karezis Grove Mount Dental Practice 2,608.00 1,978.00 76% Provider reimbursed full amount of shortfall to the Department
Mr J S Dhariwal Smile Dental Practice
S Kopacz / T Michalec Avondale Dental Practice 5,000 5,199.2 104% N/A
V Tsivos / V Loli Port Erin Dental Practice & The Square Dental Practice 28,321 (plus 720.4 C/O from 2015-2016) 27,462.60 95% Provider created capacity for new NHS patients to join the practice in lieu of financial reimbursement to the Department. 527 new patients were allocated.
S Du Toit Thie Rosien Dental Practice
JH Van Rooyen / A Lewis 65 Woodbourne Road Dental Practice 21,100.00 21171.80 100.3% N/A
JH Van Rooyen / D Hennig Westview Dental Practice (Douglas)
A Vogelzang Regent Dental Care (Peel) 18,000.00 14753.80 82% Provider created capacity for new NHS patients to join the practice from September 2016-April 2017 following the removal of the dental patient waiting list. Agreed for a full UDA carryover of 18% to be achieved in 2017- 2018.
T Bell The Tracey Bell Clinic
M Ray / I Ravat Ravat & Ray Dental Practice 18,500 12824.00 69% In Dispute
G Hill Grove Mount Dental Practice
A Karezis Grove Mount Dental Practice 2,608.00 2515.00 96% Provider carried forward the shortfall of 4% to be achieved in the following financial year (2017-2018)
Mr J S Dhariwal Smile Dental Practice
S Kopacz / T Michalec Avondale Dental Practice 6,000.00 6121.40 102% N/A

Full Response Text

Chief Executive: Malcolm Couch Freedom of Information Team DHSC Digital Cronk Coar Strang IM4 4RJ

(01624) 642621 dhsc@foi.gov.im Website: www.gov.im/dhsc

Our ref: 362737 6 April 2018

Dear ###

We write further to your request which was received on 13 March 2018 and which states:

"Question 01: For the contract year 2016-2017; the number of contracted UDA's for each provider, the number of completed UDA's for each provider and the percentage achievement for each contract. Question 02: For the contract year 2015-2016; the number of contracted UDA's for each provider, the number of completed UDA's for each provider and the percentage achievement for each contract. Question 03: Which providers received special circumstances as a one off agreement against the required financial reimbursement mentioned in FOIA/DHSC/rvsd/01 and the value of reimbursement involved that was set aside in each case. Question 04: In a FOI request dated around the 18/11/17 relating to a number of dental uda issues, the response to question 4 did not include a provider practice under this heading of either Westview Peel and/or Regent Dental Peel in relation to contract UDA achievement 2016-2017."

Our response to your request is as follows: Please find the Department’s response to Questions 01, 02 & 03 …. The tables on the following pages show for each period requested, the Provider & Dental Surgery, the Units of Dental Activity (UDAs) which were contracted to the Provider in the given year and the number of UDAs completed alongside the % of completion. We have also included information, if a Provider had not achieved 100% of the contracted UDAs in the given year, on what agreement was made between the Department and the Provider regarding the reimbursement of any shortfall. The information supplied in this FOI is the most up to date information held by the Department of Health and Social Care and should supersede previous FOIs regarding UDA delivery.

2015-2016 Provider & Practice Contracted UDAs Completed UDAs % of UDAs Achieved Year-End Agreement between the Department and the Provider V Tsivos / V Loli Port Erin Dental Practice 24,811.00 24,090.60 97% Provider carried forward the shortfall of 3% to be achieved in the following financial year (2016-2017) S Du Toit Thie Rosien Dental Practice 13,800.00 13,837.40 100.3% N/A JH Van Rooyen / A Lewis 65 Woodbourne Road Dental Practice 16,655.00 17,411.60 105% N/A JH Van Rooyen / A Vogelzang Westview Dental Practices (Douglas & Peel) 29, 980.00 (plus a carry-forward of 248 UDAs from 2014- 2015) 31,612.8 105% N/A T Bell The Tracey Bell Clinic 750.00 855.20 114% N/A M Ray / I Ravat Ravat & Ray Dental Practice 15,500.00 13,102.20 85% In dispute A Gibb Grove Mount Dental Practice 200.00 57.20 28.6% Provider reimbursed full amount of shortfall to the Department G Hill Grove Mount Dental Practice 800.00 702.20 88% Provider reimbursed full amount of shortfall to the Department A Karezis Grove Mount Dental Practice 2,608.00 1,978.00 76% Provider reimbursed full amount of shortfall to the Department Mr J S Dhariwal Smile Dental Practice 12,000.00 (plus 480 c/o from 2014-2015) 12,153.60 97% Provider carried forward the shortfall of 3% to be achieved in the following financial year (2016-2017) S Kopacz / T Michalec Avondale Dental Practice 5,000 5,199.2 104% N/A 2016-2017 Provider & Practice Contracted UDAs Completed UDAs % of UDAs Achieved Year-End Agreement between the Department and the Provider

V Tsivos / V Loli Port Erin Dental Practice & The Square Dental Practice 28,321 (plus 720.4 C/O from 2015-2016) 27,462.60 95% Provider created capacity for new NHS patients to join the practice in lieu of financial reimbursement to the Department. 527 new patients were allocated. S Du Toit Thie Rosien Dental Practice 14,800.00 14808.40 100.1% N/A JH Van Rooyen / A Lewis 65 Woodbourne Road Dental Practice 21,100.00 21171.80 100.3% N/A JH Van Rooyen / D Hennig Westview Dental Practice (Douglas) 20,000.00 19205.20 96% Provider created capacity for new NHS patients to join the practice in lieu of financial reimbursement to the Department. 265 new patients were allocated. A Vogelzang Regent Dental Care (Peel) 18,000.00 14753.80 82% Provider created capacity for new NHS patients to join the practice from September 2016-April 2017 following the removal of the dental patient waiting list. Agreed for a full UDA carryover of 18% to be achieved in 2017- 2018. T Bell The Tracey Bell Clinic 750.00 861.40 115% N/A M Ray / I Ravat Ravat & Ray Dental Practice 18,500 12824.00 69% In Dispute G Hill Grove Mount Dental Practice 800.00 642.20 80% Provider reimbursed full amount of shortfall to the Department A Karezis Grove Mount Dental Practice 2,608.00 2515.00 96% Provider carried forward the shortfall of 4% to be achieved in the following financial year (2017-2018) Mr J S Dhariwal Smile Dental Practice 12,000 (plus 326.4 C/O from 2015-2016) 11422.40 93% Provider reimbursed full amount of shortfall to the Department S Kopacz / T Michalec Avondale Dental Practice 6,000.00 6121.40 102% N/A By way of additional information, if a Provider over-achieves on their contracted UDA delivery, they are not reimbursed by the Department for this and nor is there a reduction in the UDAs they are to achieve in the following year. Question 04:“In a FOI request dated around the 18/11/17 relating to a number of dental uda issues, the response to question 4 did not include a provider practice under this heading of either Westview Peel and/or Regent Dental Peel in relation to contract UDA achievement 2016-2017”.

This question was previously asked in a separate FOI query and an amendment to FOI request IM108-739i has already been made. However, to assist the requestor please note that Regent Dental Care (previously Westview, Peel) achieved 82% of their contract in 2016-2017 which is also listed in the above table for 2016-2017 (Q01/Q02).

Please quote the reference number 362737 in any future communications.

Your right to request a review

If you are unhappy with this response to your freedom of information request, you may ask us to carry out an internal review of the response, by completing a complaint form and submitting it electronically or by delivery/post to us at:

Chief Executive: Malcolm Couch Freedom of Information Team DHSC Digital Cronk Coar Strang IM4 4RJ

(01624) 642621 dhsc@foi.gov.im Website: www.gov.im/dhsc

An electronic version of our complaint form can be found by going to our website at https://services.gov.im/freedom-of-information/Review . If you would like a paper version of our complaint form to be sent to you by post, please contact me and I will be happy to arrange for this. Your review request should explain why you are dissatisfied with this response, and should be made as soon as practicable. We will respond as soon as the review has been concluded.

If you are not satisfied with the result of the review, you then have the right to appeal to the Information Commissioner for a decision on; 1. Whether we have responded to your request for information in accordance with Part 2 of the Freedom of Information Act 2015; or 2. Whether we are justified in refusing to give you the information requested.
In response to an application for review, the Information Commissioner may, at any time, attempt to resolve a matter by negotiation, conciliation, mediation or another form of alternative dispute resolution and will have regard to any outcome of this in making any subsequent decision. More detailed information on your right to a review can be found on the Information Commissioner’s website at www.inforights.im. Should you have any queries concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Further information about freedom of information requests can be found at www.gov.im/foi.

I will now close your request as of this date.

Yours sincerely