Request for Data on Rape cases.

AuthorityIsle of Man Constabulary
Date received2017-12-01
OutcomeAll information sent
Outcome date2018-01-05
Case ID353905

Summary

The Isle of Man Constabulary provided data on sexual assault reporting and prosecution outcomes for the period between 2010 and 2017 in response to a Freedom of Information request. The response included statistical breakdowns of crime statuses, reasons for discontinuation, and the number of subjects charged versus cautioned.

Key Facts

  • The data covers seven full crime years from April 1, 2010, to March 31, 2017.
  • A total of 408 sexual assault incidents were recorded during this period.
  • Approximately one in four recorded sexual assaults resulted in a prosecution (109 charged subjects).
  • Reasons for discontinued cases frequently included insufficient evidence, withdrawn complaints, or inability to identify offenders.
  • The response explicitly states that crime reports do not record the final prosecution outcome of persons charged.

Data Disclosed

  • 408
  • 109
  • 140
  • 212
  • 56
  • 2010-2011
  • 2016-2017
  • 01/04/2010
  • 31/03/2017
  • 2017-12-01
  • 2018-01-05

Data Tables (2)

2013-2014 22 29 4 55
16 35 4 55
22 47 16 46 6 7 75 69
140 212 56 408
4 4 1 4 1 27 20
15 1 1 17
18 1 2 1 22
2014-2015 2015-2016 13 1 2 16
17 1 4 22
13 2 1 16 140
14 14 3

Full Response Text

5th January 2018 MEOIRYN SHEE-ELLAN VANNIN ISLE OF MAN CONSTABULARY Freedom of Information Our Ref: IM112310I Dear
I write in connection with your request for information dated 1st December 2017, which was received by this office on 4th December 2017. I note you seek access to the following information: Please can you provide data on the reporting to the police of and subsequent prosecutions of sexual assault cases on the Isle of Man? I would like to know how many incidents of sexual assault (including rape) are made to the Isle of Man Police and how many of those are brought to trial. Where cases were not brought to trial please give statistical data on the reasons, for example if there was insufficient evidence or where the perpetrator was unknown. Following communication with you the following response is provided: Analysis For the purposes of this report the offences listed in Annex 1 have been included as representing Sexual Offences, and those in Annex 2, although recorded in the period reviewed and classified in sexual offences category, excluded. The period analysed was from 01/04/2010 to 31/03/2017, seven full crime years. The count of incidents was based on crime reports created in the period. It should be understood that a crime report may contain reporting of multiple incidents, and also relate to incidents that occurred considerably earlier than the date of reporting. The table below shows the number of sexual assaults recorded in each year, split by the current status: Discontinued Cleared - Outstanding No Crime - Grand Crime Year Completed but NFA Not a Crime Total 2010-2011 27 17 11 55 2011-2012 20 19 18 57 2012-2013 17 19 6 42 2013-2014 22 29 4 55 2014-2015 16 35 4 55 2015-2016 22 47 6 75 2016-2017 16 46 7 69 Grand Total 140 212 56 408 There is no simple way of summarising reasons why a reported assault has been given status of discontinued, or determined to not be a recordable crime. A dip sample of update and investigation reports showed a variety of reasons for discontinuing crimes. These frequently included that there was insufficient evidence to charge with a realistic chance of conviction, (also described as "not meeting evidential threshold", or "lack of forensic evidence''), but also reasons of withdrawn complaint, (in some cases believed to be a false allegation), inability to identify offenders, or conflicting evidence. Those with status of Cleared do not in all cases indicate a prosecution followed - only those where a subject was charged progress to prosecution. The following table shows how the cleared crimes were progressed: Prosecution not pursued as Victim I Detected No subject is deceased / Crime Year Charged Cautioned Proceedings too ill Total 2010-2011 22 4 1 27 2011-2012 11 4 4 1 20 2012-2013 15 1 1 17 2013-2014 18 1 2 1 22 2014-2015 13 1 2 16 2015-2016 17 1 4 22 2016-2017 13 2 1 16 Grand Total 109 14 14 3 140 Crime reports do not record prosecution outcome of persons charged with offences. Overall, for the past seven years, roughly one in four recorded sexual assaults have resulted in a prosecution (109 charged subjects from 408 reports). Annex 1 Offences Included in review Offence Description ABDUCT FEMALE FOR MARRIAGE OR SEX ADMINISTER DRUGS TO OBTAIN SEXUAL INTERCOURSE BUGGERY GROSS INDECENCY GROSS INDECENCY WITH CHILD INDECENT ASSAULT ON FEMALE INDECENT ASSAULT ON FEMALE UNDER 16 YEARS INDECENT ASSAULT ON MALE INDECENT ASSAULT ON MALE UNDER 16 YEARS PROCURE CHILD TO COMMIT GROSS INDECENCY RAPE SEXUAL GROOMING U.S.I WITH MALE UNDER 13 YEARS U.S.I. WITH FEMALE UNDER 13 YRS U.S.I. WITH FEMALE UNDER 16 YEARS Annex 2 Offences Not Included in review Offence Description KEEPING A BROTHEL INDECENT EXPOSURE ABDUCTION OF MALE / FEMALE UNDER 16 YEARS BIGAMY UNLAWFUL DETENTION / ATT. UNLAWFUL DETENTION Yours sincerely Freedom of Information Officer Your right to request a review If you are unhappy with this response to your Freedom of Information request, you may ask us to carry out an internal review of the response, by completing a complaint form and submitting it electronically or by delivery/post to The Freedom of Information Officer, Isle of Man Constabulary, Dukes Avenue, Douglas, IM2 4RG. An electronic version and paper version of our complaint form can be found by going to our website. Your review request should explain why you are dissatisfied with this response, and should be made as soon as practicable. We will respond as soon as the review has been concluded. If you are not satisfied with the result of the review, you then have the right to appeal to the Information Commissioner for a decision on; 1 Whether we have responded to your request for information in accordance with Part 2 of the Freedom of Information Act 2015; or 2 Whether we are justified in refusing to give you the information requested. In response to an application for review, the Information Commissioner may, at any time, attempt to resolve a matter by negotiation, conciliation, mediation or another form of alternative dispute resolution and will have regard to any outcome of this in making any subsequent decision. More detailed information on your rights to review is on the Information Commissioner's website at: https://www.inforights.im/