Unpublished Responses to FOIA Requests
| Authority | Department of Health and Social Care |
|---|---|
| Date received | 2022-09-09 |
| Outcome | All information sent |
| Outcome date | 2022-10-05 |
| Case ID | 2620410 |
Summary
The request sought unpublished Freedom of Information responses from the Department of Health and Social Care, but the provided text contains a specific response regarding colonoscopy waiting times, monthly procedure statistics, and backlog reduction plans.
Key Facts
- The average waiting time for a colonoscopy to investigate potential cancer is less than two weeks.
- Routine colonoscopies following an outpatient consultation have an average waiting time of seven months.
- The UK NHS standard for colonoscopy waiting times is 6 weeks, with 96.1% of patients meeting this target.
- The Endoscopy Unit moved to a new facility in September, increasing productivity by 25%.
- Plans to clear backlogs include employing a Nurse Endoscopist and adding a weekly list at Ramsey Cottage Hospital.
Data Disclosed
- 285
- 56
- 62
- 140
- 543
- less than two weeks
- one week
- seven months
- 6 weeks
- 96.1%
- July 16
- August 16
- September 16
- October 16
- November 16
- December 16
- 78
- 88
- 98
- 123
- 105
- 75
- 30 patients
- 48 patients
- 25%
- 5 colonoscopies per week
Original Request
Please provide copies of Responses made by you in relation to Requests for Information made under the Freedom of Information Act 2015 ("FOIA") , which you haven't included in the Disclosure Log here - https://services.gov.im/freedom-of-information/search from when the FOIA was introduced under the Appointed Day Order here - https://www.tynwald.org.im/links/tls/SD/2015-SD-0264.pdf to date.
Data Tables (105)
| Less than 6 months | 6-9 months | 9-12 months | 12 months + | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 285 | 56 | 62 | 140 | 543 |
| July 16 | August 16 | September 16 | October 16 | November 16 | December 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colonoscopies undertaken | 78 | 88 | 98 | 123 | 105 | 75 |
| Number of F1's received in relation to Dental treatment | Number of dental F1s approved | Number of dental F1s refused | Number of optical F1s received | Number of optical F1s approved | Number of optical F1s refused | Number of claims that were for both dental and opthalmic | Number for both applications that were approved | Number for both applications that were refused | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | 69 | 51 | 18 | 89 | 67 | 22 | 34 | 25 | 9 |
| 2013-14 | 117 | 91 | 26 | 119 | 78 | 41 | 39 | 26 | 13 |
| 2014-15 | 119 | 86 | 33 | 221 | 111 | 110 | 52 | 30 | 22 |
| 2015-16 | 150 | 117 | 33 | 241 | 129 | 112 | 53 | 34 | 19 |
| 2016-17 to date | 155 | 136 | 19 | 159 | 67 | 92 | 40 | 26 | 14 |
| Householder | Age | Allowance |
|---|---|---|
| A single claimant householder (homeowner) | Age under 60 | £105.28 |
| Age over 60 | £140.85 | |
| Single claimant if not a householder (tenant) | Age under 18 | £82.92 |
| Age 18 – 60 | £98.76 | |
| Age over 60 | £120.81 | |
| Either a claimant or a partner is: | Age under 60 | £165.04 |
| Age over 60 | £202.93 | |
| Age over 65 | £209.27 | |
| Threshold per child | Age under 5 | £26.08 |
| Age 5 -11 | £32.14 | |
| Age over 11 | £38.20 | |
| Capital disregard | Total Above: | 13,000.00 |
| Type of Wheelchair | Definition of the Chair Group | Usual Criteria for Issue |
|---|---|---|
| Attendant Manual Wheelchair | A standard chair that requires an attendant to push the chair. Small wheels at the back prevent user being able to propel the chair. These chairs are foldable for transportation | The patient has a carer, who is able and willing to manage and manoeuvre the wheelchair safely. The patient is not medically fit to self propel. |
| Self – Propelled Manual Wheelchair | A standard chair with large wheels at the rear allowing the user to propel themselves or have an attendant assist them. These chairs are foldable for transportation | The patient must be deemed medically fit to self propel and this should not be detrimental to their medical condition. The patient has ability and will use a self-propelling wheelchair to allow a degree of indoor/outdoor mobility, which will increase independence and function. In exceptional circumstances, may be provided for carers who would benefit from improved, manoeuvrability gained by large rear wheels |
| Active User Manual Wheelchair (quickie style) | Originally designed for sport, active user chairs are more flexible than the standard chairs and can be adjusted to meet the individual requirements of users so that he/she can achieve the maximum amount of mobility. They have quick release wheels, multiple axle positions and frames that are available in a wide variety of sizes. | The criteria for a self-propelling wheelchair must be met. The patient is dependent on wheelchair mobility equipment indoors and outdoors for the majority of the day. The patient’s medical condition results in a reduced strength and/or major excessive activity would result in deterioration of the patient’s medical condition. The patient meets the criteria and their lifestyle needs and ability must be such that maximum independence and mobility will be gained by such provision. |
| Type of Wheelchair | Definition of the Chair Group | Usual Criteria for Issue |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Buggy | A buggy is a type of pushchair allowing a patient (generally a child) clinically appropriate mobility beyond that which can be provided through generally available pushchairs. | Meets criteria re assistance with outdoor mobility i.e. can only walk short distances due to physical problems To facilitate opportunities to participate in activities such as playing in the playground, where they would not have the energy to do so if they had had to walk there first. Child typically over 30 months of age and are either too tall or heavy for a commercial buggy for mobility need |
| Specialist Buggy | A buggy is a type of pushchair allowing a patient (generally a child) clinically appropriate seating and mobility beyond that which can be provided through generally available pushchairs. | Buggies may be provided as an alternative to a wheelchair, where it best meets the clinical and mobility needs, usually issued to children.Child requires additional postural support to provide a good symmetrical posture and enable them to be upright for their physical wellbeing and social interaction.Where a wheelchair is not deemed the most suitable option or parents/guardians are not at a stage of acceptance to transition from using a buggy to a wheelchair for practical or emotional reasons. |
| Tilt in Space Wheelchair (Manual) | A tilt in space chair is one with a mechanism that allows for the whole seat system to be tilted, rather than just the back rest reclined, thus aiding a change in position for pressure relief while maintaining postural support. | These wheelchairs are provided where the tilt facility is the only way of maintaining sitting balance/posture within a chair, in combination with managing the requirements of the patient’s physical needs. The patient is fully dependent on the provision of a chair for postural support, positioning and comfort. Pressure care will be considered in all wheelchairs. Carers can demonstrate that they are able to operate the system safely, access transport and detach component parts for safety and comfort of the patient. These chairs will not be provided solely to overcome moving, handling and hoisting issues. |
| Electric Powered Indoor/Outdoor Chair (EPIOC) | A wheelchair with electric motors controlled by the user for indoor and outdoor use. | These wheelchairs will be considered when other possibilities have been excluded and the Criteria for EPIC provision are met and the user also needs the chair for regular outdoor use. This will depend on the patient’s individual needs and their capabilities. Clinical need and the environment at home will be assessed by the Wheelchair Service. The home should be accessible i.e. ramps or level access from indoors to outdoors. Where these are not present but could be installed, relevant referrals can be made to appropriate services for adaptations to be carried out, prior to a chair being issued. The patient has the ability to comply with the DVLA requirements for motor vehicle drivers concerning epilepsy and other causes of loss of consciousness (see document vi – Epilepsy Guidelines) |
|---|---|---|
| Electrically Powered Outdoor Chair | A wheelchair with electric motors controlled by the user. This is designed for outdoor use. | In addition to the main criteria relating to having a condition that permanently seriously affects a patient’s ability to walk, the patient must have clinical needs in relation to posture, pressure and pain which means that a scooter cannot be used. AND The patient is going to use the chair outside on a frequent basis to undertake core activities of daily living. Although the patient may not meet the criteria for an EPIOC chair we may meet the patient’s needs within this section of the criteria with the provision of an EPIOC chair. |
| Type of Wheelchair | Definition of the Chair Group | Usual Criteria for Issue |
|---|---|---|
| Class Three Vehicle/Wheelchair | A powered wheelchair for use on roads/highways with a maximum speed limit of 8mph and facility to travel at 4mph on footways. | These are only issued in one exceptional circumstance where the patient’s weight and size precludes the use of other wheelchairs. |
| Cushions, Accessories and Modifications associated with Wheelchair provision | Cushions, accessories and modifications will be provided as appropriate following assessment for clinical need. Cushions are provided to achieve comfort, satisfactory posture and increased stability and to aid pressure ulcer prevention and management. Where there is a need to support the management of acute pressure sores the Wheelchair Service will liaise with the Community Nursing Service or the Tissue Viability Service. Cushions will be considered for private chairs relating to an individual patient’s case. |
| HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Children with a rapidly deteriorating condition or short prognosis. | Assessment required to enable issue of correct size wheelchair. | None. |
| Children requiring independent mobility (manual or powered) indoors. | Existing commercial buggy outgrown or transportable buggy required for school attendance. | (Requests for provision of standard Major Elite buggies will be met via direct issue). |
| The inability to sit in a commercially available buggy and a requirement for postural support to enable outdoor mobility. | Children requiring increased postural support but not immediately at risk in current privately owned equipment. | |
| The long term need for a wheelchair (self or attendant propelled) for essential mobility indoors, to enable discharge from hospital. |
| HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Children with a rapidly deteriorating condition or short prognosis. A sudden deterioration in posture associated with a rapid growth spurt. Children at risk of injury through continued use of existing equipment. For example: • Pressure ulcer or marking; • Self harming behaviour; • Tipping or rocking the buggy/wheelchair. | A review of existing equipment is required due to a change in clinical need. For example: • The equipment has been outgrown; • A buggy is no longer age appropriate; • Manual handling risk for carers; • Alternative postural support is needed but the child is not immediately at risk in the existing equipment. A self-propelling wheelchair, EPIC or EPIOC is required to enable functional independent mobility. Equipment on issue is clinically appropriate but a voucher is required to enable funding for a wheelchair with additional functional or lifestyle features that would benefit the child. | Request for assessment under the Bursary Scheme where the existing equipment is clinically appropriate and where there would be no clinical or functional benefit for the child. For example: • Parents do not like the appearance of the existing equipment; • Parents wish to purchase a higher specification wheelchair for outdoor use only. |
| HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Adults with a rapidly deteriorating condition or short prognosis. The need for essential functional independent mobility due to living alone or spending a substantial part of the day alone. To enable discharge from hospital, an adult with a long term need for a wheelchair requires one in the home either for independent mobility or as an essential mobility aid for use by a carer. The existence of a pressure ulcer over any area of skin that would come into contact with the wheelchair or seating system that would be supplied. | Adults at risk of postural deterioration. Adults with a stable or slowly deteriorating condition who require assessment. Requests for assessment as a result of any other issues highlighted at the time of initial referral. | Requests for assessment for provision of equipment under the partnership Voucher Scheme. Requests for assessment for a wheelchair mainly for outdoor use or very limited indoor use. |
| HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Adults with a rapidly deteriorating condition or short prognosis. An acute exacerbation occurring in a condition characterised by relapses and remissions. The risk of injury if current equipment continues to be used or notification that an incident has occurred. The existence of a pressure ulcer over any area of skin that comes into contact with the wheelchair or seating system that has been supplied. An ongoing period of intervention requiring further action and appointments. | Adults who are totally dependent or dependant on a wheelchair for a substantial part of every day and require a review of existing equipment due to a change in clinical need. The risk of postural deterioration. Adults with a stable or slowly deteriorating condition who require re-assessment. | Requests for assessment for provision of equipment under the partnership Voucher Scheme. Requests for re-assessment as a result of any other issues identified. Requests for review despite the fact that existing equipment meets current clinical needs. |
| Grade | Description of User | Equipment Needs |
|---|---|---|
| 1. (CAT 4) | PART TIME USER SHORT TERM – Temporary requirement due to accident or operation. (May include terminal care) | Pushed or self-propelling standard. Special chair may be required e.g. recliner for full leg plaster or hip spica. |
| 2. (CAT 3) | PART TIME USER LONG TERM – Ability to walk short distances. Requires wheelchair on regular basis for outdoor use or to enhance quality of life for user/carer. | Pushed standard or lightweight self propelling standard. Buggies for children. |
| 3. (CAT 2) | PART TIME USER LONG TERM – variable walking ability due to fluctuating condition. High degree of independent life-style but requires wheelchair to maintain level of independence and quality of life. | Self propelling standard or lightweight. |
| 4. (CAT 1) | FULL TIME USER LOW ACTIVITY – limited or lack of ability to self propel. Dependent for many daily living needs. | Pushed or self propelling standard or buggy. Specialist chassis for custom- made seat. |
| 5. (CAT 1) | FULL TIME USER ACTIVE – unable to self propel. Independent mobility with powered wheelchair. Degree of independence in daily living activities. | EPIC & EPIOC depending on ability/environment + motivation + transit. Transit for travel. |
| 6. (CAT 1) | FULL TIME USER ACTIVE – Independent mobility and lifestyle. Appropriate equipment reduces dependence on others and improves quality of life. | Self propelling standard or high performance (adjustable stability by change of wheel position). |
| Referrals | Minimum Response Time in Working Days |
|---|---|
| All referrals will be screened by approved personnel within the service | 2 |
| Referrals will be acknowledged to the referrer | 5 |
| Incomplete referrals will be returned to the referrer | 2 |
| From receipt of referral to assessment | 15 |
| From prescription to delivery for following types of equipment: | |
| 1 Locally held stock. | 15 |
| 2 Orders from manufacturers | 30 |
| 3 Made to measure | 30 to 65 |
| For Type 3 the Service will obtain an estimated date of delivery from the manufacturer and inform the client within: | 5 |
| Non-emergency Repairs will be completed in: | 3 |
| Cat 3 user or if chair is operable and safe without urgent repair | |
| Emergency Repairs/Responses will be within: | 24 hours |
| Cat 1 ,Cat 2 and Cat 4 users where the chair is unsuitable for use without repair | |
| Deliveries will be completed within: | 5 |
| Collections should be completed within: | 5 |
| ISLE OF MAN WHEELCHAIR SERVICE REFERRAL FORM This form must be completed by a GP or AHP. When fully completed, please send the form to the Wheelchair Service, CCHC, Douglas:- Tel: 01624 642147 Email: (Nb. Incomplete forms may be returned and therefore could result in a delay to the assessment of a wheelchair) |
|---|
| REFERRERS NAME/ROLE TEL NO: DATE OF REFERRAL: |
| HAS THE CLIENT CONSENTED TO THIS REFERRAL? PLEASE CIRCLE YES NO CLIENT DETAILS |
| SURNAME TITLE: MR/MRS/MISS/MS/MASTER |
| FORENAME(S): DATE OF BIRTH: |
| ADDRESS/POSTCODE: |
| TEL NO: |
| NOK’S NAME/TEL NO: RELATIONSHIP: CONSENT TO CONTACT: YES/NO |
| G.P/SURGERY |
| IS AN INTERPRETER REQUIRED? NO YES WHAT LANGUAGE?: |
| PHYSICAL INFORMATION |
| DIAGNOSIS AND ONSET: |
| PREVIOUS MEDICAL HISTORY – INCLUDING CARDIAC/RESPIRATORY/NEUROLOGICAL/POSTURAL LIMITATIONS: |
| MEDICATION, IF KNOWN |
| HEIGHT: WEIGHT: PRESSURE CARE ISSUES? PLEASE CIRCLE & STATE YES NO MOBILITY/TRANSFER METHOD: CARER LIMITATIONS: |
| VISION: NO PROBLEMS NEEDS GLASSES VISUAL IMPAIRMENT (STATE) REGISTERED BLIND |
| HEARING: NO PROBLEMS IMPAIRED DEAF |
| COGNITIVE/PERCEPTUAL IMPAIRMENT? |
| SEATED MEASUREMENTS - HIP WIDTH: HIP DEPTH: LEG LENGTH: |
| REASON FOR WHEELCHAIR REQUEST |
| CURRENT WHEELCHAIR: YES* NO *IF YES, GIVE DETAILS (MODEL/ASSET NO IF CCHC STOCK/?PRIVATE) |
| CATEGORY OF NEED: PERMANENT NEED HOSPITAL DISCHARGE-PERMANENT SHORT TERM REHAB |
| TYPE OF WHEELCHAIR REQUESTED: ATTENDANT PROPELLED SELF-PROPELLED POWERED |
| HOW OFTEN WILL THE WHEELCHAIR BE USED?: <3 DAYS A WEEK OVER 3 DAYS A WEEK DAILY |
| WHERE WILL THE WHEELCHAIR WANT TO BE USED? INDOORS ONLY OUTDOORS ONLY IN & OUTDOORS WORK SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED EG. ACCESS ISSUES/DOOR WIDTHS? |
| TRANSPORT USED: (PLEASE STATE)- |
| Jurisdiction (Law) | Grounds for termination | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate need to preserve life of mother | Prevention of grave permanent injury to physical or mental health of woman (Time limit) | Risk to physical or mental health of the woman or existing children greater than from continuance of pregnancy(social grounds) (Time limit) | Significant risk of serious handicap in child | Pregnancy resulting from sexual crimes | |
| Isle of Man (Termination of Pregnancy (Medical Defences) Act 1995) | Yes* | Yes* | No | Yes (24 weeks) | Yes (12 weeks) |
| England, Scotland, Wales (Abortion Act 1967) | Yes | Yes (no time limit) | Yes (24 weeks) | Yes (no time limit) | Would be covered by other grounds |
| Jersey (Termination of Pregnancy (Jersey) Law 1997 | Yes | Yes (no time limit) | Yes (distress –12 weeks) | Yes (24 weeks) | “ |
| Guernsey (The Abortion (Guernsey) Law, 1997) | Yes | Yes (no time limit) | Yes (12 weeks) | Yes (24 weeks) | “ |
| Northern Ireland (Offences Against the Person Act 1861) | Yes | Yes – as a result R v. Bourne [1939] | No | No | No |
| Gibraltar (Crimes Act 2011) | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Ireland (Constitution 8th Amendment, 1983) | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Year | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Patient Deaths Recorded as Suicide | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Year | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Patient Deaths Recorded as Suicide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Year | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Complaints | Reason | Complainant |
| 1 | Communication/Information to Patient (written and oral) | Family Member |
| 1 | Attitude of Staff | Family Member |
| 2 | Total |
| Year | 2012 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Complaints | Reason | Complainant |
| 6 | Attitude of Staff | Patient |
| 1 | Attitude of Staff | Family Member |
| 2 | Personal Records (including medical and/or complaint) | Patient |
| 3 | Clinical Treatment | Family Member |
| 2 | Clinical Treatment | Other |
| 1 | Failure to Follow Procedures | Family Member |
| 1 | Patient Privacy & Dignity | Family Member |
| 16 | Total |
| Year | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Complaints | Reason | Complainant |
| 2 | Attitude of Staff | Family Member |
| 7 | Clinical Treatment | Patient |
| 14 | Clinical Treatment | Family Member |
| 2 | Clinical Treatment | Other |
| 1 | Transport | Patient |
| 1 | Admission Transfer and Discharge Arrangements | Family Member |
| 1 | Attitude of Staff | Patient |
| 1 | Attitude of Staff | Other |
| 1 | Complaints Handling | Patient |
| 1 | Personal Records (including medical and/or complaint) | Other |
| 1 | Personal Records (including medical and/or complaint) | Family Member |
| 1 | Other | Patient |
|---|---|---|
| 33 | Total |
| Year | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Complaints | Reason | Complainant |
| 12 | Clinical Treatment | Patient |
| 10 | Clinical Treatment | Family Member |
| 1 | Clinical Treatment | Other |
| 1 | Accommodation | Other |
| 1 | Communication/Information to Patient (written and oral) | Family Member |
| 1 | Other | Family Member |
| 1 | Other | Patient |
| 27 | Total |
| Year | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Complaints | Reason | Complainant |
| 1 | Clinical Treatment | Other |
| 1 | Policy and Commercial Decisions | Family Member |
| 2 | Appointments Delay/Cancellation Outpatient | Family Member |
| 2 | Communication/Information to Patient (written and oral) | Patient |
| 3 | Communication/Information to Patient (written and oral) | Family Member |
| 1 | Communication/Information to Patient (written and oral) | Other |
| 7 | Clinical Treatment | Family Member |
| 3 | Clinical Treatment | Patient |
| 1 | Attitude of Staff | Other |
| 1 | Other | Family Member |
| 22 | Total |
| Year | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Complaints | Reason | Complainant |
| 2 | Admission Transfer and Discharge arrangements | Family Member |
| 1 | Appointments delay/cancellation outpatient | Family Member |
| 2 | Communication/Information to Patient (written and oral) | Family Member |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Other | Family Member |
| 3 | Other | Patient |
| 4 | Other | Other |
| 3 | Clinical Treatment | Patient |
| 10 | Clinical Treatment | Family Member |
| 2 | Clinical Treatment | Other |
| 31 | Total |
| Year | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Complaints | Reason | Complainant |
| 1 | Other | Family Member |
| 1 | Total |
| Career |
|---|
| Change |
| Post | Reason | Date | Still work for ALDS | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRSW | Stepped down to RSW | 01.08.13 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Moved to OPS | 20.10.13 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Moved to AI | 30.04.14 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Retired age 55 | 10.09.14 | No | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Stepped down to RSW | 01.10.14 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Moved to OPS | 18.02.15 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Stepped down to RSW | 01.03.15 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Moved to AI | 05.04.15 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Moved to ASAT | 28.06.15 | No | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Stepped down to DSW | 28.09.15 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Moved to AI | 10.01.16 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Now QCF Assessor for Adult Social Care | 01.06.16 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Moved to OPS | 16.01.17 | Yes | ||||||||||
| SRSW | Stepped down to RSW | 01.10.16 | Yes | ||||||||||
| RSW | To commence nurse training | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 57 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 59 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Dismissed | No | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 65 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired – ill health | No | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 61 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 60 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 56 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Resigned | No | |||||||||||
| RSW | Moved to UK | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 55 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Moved to Dept of Education | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 64 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 65 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired – ill health | No | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 60 | No | |||||||||||
| RSW | Dismissed | No | |||||||||||
| RSW | Resigned | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 62 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Moved to LEaD | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 65 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 60 | No | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired – ill health | No | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 64 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Retired age 60 | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Career change | Yes | |||||||||||
| RSW | Resigned | No |
| RSW | Moved to UK | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSW | Resigned | No | |||||
| RSW | Resigned | No | |||||
| RSW | Resigned | No | |||||
| RSW | Resigned | No | |||||
| RSW | Retired age 65 | No | |||||
| RSW | Retired age 65 | Yes | |||||
| RSW | Retired age 63 | No |
| Financial Year | Total Cost |
|---|---|
| 1st Apr 2014 – 31st Mar 2015 | £18,871,863 |
| 1st Apr 2015 – 31st Mar 2016 | £21,154,530 |
| 1st Apr 2016 – end of Jan 2017 | £19,136,581 |
| Financial Year | Flight costs (inc. Air Ambulance) | Other Transport Costs (boat, taxis (IOM & UK), accommodation contribution and mileage) | Cost of treatment & care in UK | *Admin costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Apr 2014 – 31st Mar 2015 | £3,418,358 | £769,742 | £14,505,323 | £178,440 |
| 1st Apr 2015 – 31st Mar 2016 | £3,573,717 | £839,863 | £16,630,342 | £110,608 |
| 1st Apr 2016 – end of Jan 2017 | £3,060,107 | £734,636 | £15,223,769 | £118,069 |
| Financial Year | Number of patient journeys | Number of Escort journeys |
|---|---|---|
| 1st April 2014 – 31st March 2015 | 9,608 | 5,835 |
| 1st April 2015 – 31st March 2016 | 9,752 | 6,070 |
| 1st April 2016 – end of January 2017 | 8,727 | 5,615 |
| Bank Holiday Monday | 5 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 25 |
| Wednesdays | 31 |
| Thursday | 30 |
| Friday | 32 |
| Saturday | 4 |
| Sunday | 7 |
| Item | Additional Services Rates | £ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 |
| Page and paragraph number, or other reference for the element of information you regard as confidential | Marking - either ‘in confidence’ or ‘commercially sensitive’ | Why you consider element of information to be confidential |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Holiday Monday | 5 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 25 |
| Wednesdays | 31 |
| Thursday | 30 |
| Friday | 32 |
| Saturday | 4 |
| Sunday | 7 |
| 3.1 The service will provide an outcome based model of service delivery, |
|---|
| which is designed to ensure that people receive a personalised service |
| which meets their assessed needs. |
| A retention, storage and disposal schedule is a timetable for the planned review of all |
|---|
| records to determine their ultimate fate, which is either: |
| This schedule lists record types with brief descriptions and their minimum required |
| retention period. Note that retention periods apply to both paper and electronic |
| records. At the end of their retention period, a sample of records from a series should |
| be reviewed before destruction to confirm that they are no longer required. |
| The schedules identify those records likely to have permanent research and |
| historical value. |
| Some records may have a long-term research value outside the Department that |
|---|
| created them (e.g. both administrative and clinical records from a number of |
| different hospitals have been used to study the 1918 influenza epidemic). The |
| Information Governance team will liaise with the Public Records Office to determine |
| the current and potential research uses of records. |
| The following factors must be considered when storing records: |
| It is important that libraries are well managed to ensure space is efficiently utilised |
|---|
| and the width of aisles and general layout of storage areas conform to fire, health |
| and safety regulations. In addition all records must be stored off the floor to |
| provide some protection from flood, dampness and dust. |
| It is important that where other paper records are stored, e.g. offices etc, these |
|---|
| need to be stored effectively, conform to fire and health and safety precautions. In |
| addition, all records must be stored off the floor to provide some protection from |
| flood, dampness and dust. |
| Non-paper storage includes electronic and microfilm formats. |
| Electronic and microfilm formats are used to capture and store images of otherwise |
| bulky or deteriorating archival material. However managers must be aware of issues |
| around storing records particularly in microfilm format where there may be a |
| reduction in the clarity of records printed. |
| When records identified for disposal are destroyed, a register of these records needs |
|---|
| to be kept. When records have reached the end of their retention period the |
| Information Governance Team should be contacted to assist with the secure disposal |
| of the records or transfer to the Public Record Office. |
| In the case of electronic records please note that a record is not deleted if it is merely |
|---|
| sent to the ‘recycle bin’. It must also be deleted from this folder to be considered fully |
| deleted. This is important in terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2015. |
| Records which do not contain personal or sensitive material may be disposed of in |
|---|
| the normal manner i.e. shredding or confidential wheelie bin or other recycling |
| facilities where possible. Contractors employed to shred confidential |
| information/records will be asked to produce written certificates as proof of |
| destruction. |
| The Information Governance Manager will be responsible for advising on local policy |
|---|
| for the retention, archiving or disposal of Adult Services records. The destruction of |
| records is an irreversible act and must be clearly documented. |
| Records not selected for archival preservation and which have reached the end of |
| their administrative life will be destroyed. |
| If a record due for destruction is known to be the subject of a request for information |
| or potential legal action the records must not be destroyed. The minimum retention |
| periods should be calculated from the end of the calendar year following the last |
| entry in the record. |
| In the majority of cases records will be disposed of when they reach their retention |
|---|
| period. However, when assessing whether records or information is required to be |
| retained for a longer period than that identified within the Retention Schedule, |
| consideration should be given to the holding of information for longer than necessary |
| which incurs extra storage costs and leaves the Department vulnerable to risks of |
| theft, misuse, disclosure, legal discovery and non-compliance fines. |
| Examples of when information may be required to be held for longer periods are |
|---|
| where: |
| Records which have been identified in the Retention Schedule as permanent |
| records are to be transferred to the Public Record Office. The Information |
| Governance Manager is responsible for co-ordinating this process with the Public |
| Record Office. If records are to be reviewed prior to selection this should be carried |
| out by the Information Governance Manager in conjunction with the Public Record |
| Office and any criteria or sampling processes used recorded for future use. |
| The Director of Adult Services is responsible for the implementation and |
| enforcement with the policy. |
| Details | Minimum Retention Period | Rationale | PRA selection | Final action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisional Plans | 25 years | Records Management ISO 15489 9.2 Information Security ISO 2700-1 4.3.2 (f); 4.3.3. England & Wales best practice | Permanent | Transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Divisional Reports | 25 years | Division best practice | Permanent | Transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Divisional Strategies | 25 years | Division best practice | Permanent | Transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Minutes of Departmental Meetings | 2 years as master copy will be held by CEO Office | Division best practice | Permanent | Transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Minutes of Divisional Meetings | 30 years | Division best practice | Permanent | Transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Minutes of other non- Departmental/Divisional meetings | 2 years unless relating to an individual then use retention period for records of individuals | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Papers of minor or short lived importance not covered elsewhere - e.g. advertising matter - covering & appointment letters | 2 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| - reminders; drafts - registers complied for temporary purposes; routine reports | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office Diaries | 2 years after the end of the calendar year to which they refer | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Social Work Diaries | 6 years after year to which they relate | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Phone Message Books | 2 years NB Any service user information should be transferred to the service user record | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Information Leaflets | 2 years | National Audit Office best practice | One copy of each | Transfer one copy to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention; destroy duplicates after 2 years |
| Divisional Policies/Procedures/ Protocols | 10 years | Division best practice | Review | Select for permanent preservation only those that relate to core activities and transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years |
| Project Files | 10 years after completion of project | National Audit Office best practice | Review | Review with the Public Record Office to select which should be permanently preserved. Transfer selected records to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Major Reports | 30 years | Division best practice | Permanent | Transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Consultants – records relating to their appointment | 5 years | Division best practice | Review | Review with the Public Record Office to select which should be |
| permanently preserved. Transfer selected records to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tynwald questions (held by the Department) | 10 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Investigations commissioned by Division (not OHR Investigations) | 30 years | Division best practice | Review | Review with the Public Record Office to select which should be permanently preserved. Transfer selected records to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention. |
| Contracts | 10 years after termination of contract | Division best practice | Review | Review with the Public Record Office to select which should be permanently preserved. Transfer selected records to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Building Management including leases (Operational managers to maintain) | Period of lease plus 12 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Building Plans (Department held) | Lifetime of building | Division best practice | Permanent | Transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Maintenance Contracts | 6 years from end of contract | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Insurance (Department held) | 6 years after policy expiry | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Funerals under the National Assistance Act 1951 | 6 years after completion of funeral | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Procedures in relation to funeral applications under the National Assistance Act 1951 | Permanent | Division best practice | Permanent | Transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Trust Housing | 12 years after termination of tenancy agreement | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Housing unsuccessful applications | 2 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Endowment committees | 1 year | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Endowment committees minutes | 6 years | Permanent retention | Permanent | Transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Blind Register/BD8 forms | Until individual moves away from the Isle of Man or until death | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Blue Badges – after refusal, issue or renewal | 3 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Disabled Register/ Green application form completed by applicant | 1 year | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Bus Passes | 1 year | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Unsuccessful tender documents | Life of successful contract | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Missing Persons notifications from other authorities | 6 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Budgets and Estimates | 6 y e a r s a f t e r e n d of financial year to which they relate | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Accounts – annual | 6 years after end of financial year to which they relate | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Accounts – minor records - e.g. - accounts of petty cash - travel & subsistence accounts - minor vouchers; order books - receipt books; - income records | 6 years after end of financial year to which they relate | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Audit records (internal and | 2 years from the date of | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| external audit) original documents | completion of the audit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audit reports – internal and external letters, value for money reports and system/final accounts memoranda) | 2 years after formal completion by statutory auditor | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Cash books | 6 years after end of financial year to which they relate | Limitation Act 1984 | No | Destroy |
| Cash sheets | 6 years after end of financial year to which they relate | Limitation Act 1984 | No | Destroy |
| Invoices | 6 years after end of financial year to which they relate | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Bank Statements | 2 years from completion of audit | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Financial Audit records | 2 years from completion of audit | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Business Continuity Plans | 20 years | Division best practice | Plans that were put into action as part of a major incident are selected for permanent preservation. All other plans are not selected. | Transfer records selected for permanent preservation to IOMPRO when 25 years old. Destroy records not selected by IOMPRO at the end of the retention period. |
| Technical Documentation | 20 years | Division best practice | Review | Review with the Public Record Office to select which should be permanently preserved. Transfer selected records to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention. |
| Complaints, correspondence, | 10 years from completion of action | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| investigations and outcomes (stage 1 and 2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complaints that result in change of practice (stage 3) | 20 years | Division best practice | Permanent | Transfer to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Close circuit TV images (CCTV) | 31 days | UK Information Commissioner’s Code of Conduct | No | Destroy |
| Flexi working hours (personal record of hours actually worked) | 12 months | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Health and safety documentation | 3 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Press cuttings | 1 year | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Press Releases | 7 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Public Consultations e.g. about future provision of services | 5 years | Division best practice | Review Documentation that relate to selected records. | Review with the Public Record Office to select which should be permanently preserved. Transfer selected records to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention. |
| Receipts for registered, recorded or special delivery mail | 2 years following the end of the financial year to which they relate | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Records of custody and transfer of keys | 2 years after last entry | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Requests for information Data Protection Act (Subject Access Request) Access to Health Records & Reports Act Code of Practice for Access to | 3 years after last action | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Government Information | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom of Information (FOI) requests | 3 years after full disclosure; 10 years if information is redacted or the information requested is not disclosed | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Information Security Compliance Audit | Audit to ascertain compliance with information security requirements - Retain records for 3 years after Date Closed | Data Protection Act 2002 | No | Destroy |
| Incident Response & Investigation – Data Breaches; Response to & investigation of security breach Incidents (correspondence, investigation report, subsequent action; resolution of incident) | Retain records 6 years after Date Created | Limitation Act 1984 Computer Security Act 1992 | No | Destroy |
| Details | Minimum Retention Period | Rationale | PRA selection | Final action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Referrals/ NFA’s - i.e. does not become a case | 6 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Social Work/Duty Manager/ Practitioner Diaries | 6 years after year to which they relate | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Service User records – record kept for | 10 years | Division best practice | Sample as agreed | Transfer sample to the Public |
| life, then after death (including resident financial records) | (see below) | Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health & Safety audits | 5 years from completion of audit | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Incident forms/Accident books | 10 years | Division best practice | Review with the Public Record Office to select which should be permanently preserved. | Transfer selected records to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention. |
| Quality Assurance audits | 5 years from completion of audit | Division best practice | Sample records relating to changes in policy or procedures | Transfer sample to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Local/team procedures & work instructions (see above for divisional procedures) | 7 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Duty Rotas | 4 years | National Audit Office guidance | No | Destroy |
| Communication Book Report Books Daily logs | 7 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Occupancy Forms | 12 months | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Timesheets | 12 months | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| MAR Sheets | 7 years | Department of Health best practice | No | Destroy |
| Controlled Drugs Book | 20 years | Division best practice Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 | No | Destroy |
| Safer management of controlled drugs: a guide to good practice in secondary care (England). October 2007 Dept. of Health, 17th October 2007 http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/P ublicationsandstatistics/Publ ications/PublicationsPolicyA ndGuidance/DH 079618 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Books or sheets used to record checks and tests on equipment such as oxygen cylinders, glucometers, suction machines etc. | 8 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Nurse Call system (printouts) | 2 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Maintenance Reports (record of maintenance reports & job references) Arjo (reports re: hoists etc. which are sent to Estates) | 2 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Vehicle Log Sheets | 6 months | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Temperature log books (Food/Hygiene and Medication) | 2 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Person with offences against children – record kept for life, then after death | 10 years after death | Division best practice based on common practice | No | Destroy |
| Fire Registers | 6 months | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Fire Risk Assessments | 2 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visitors Books | 7 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Receipts for items bought by service user | 6 years and current | Division best practice based on Financial Regulations | No | Destroy |
| Cash handover sheets | 12 months plus current year | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Order books & Invoices | See Finance | |||
| Staff Records (leavers) | Passed to HR for retention |
| Details | Minimum Retention Period | Rationale | PRA selection | Final action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Referrals/ NFA’s - i.e. does not become a case | 6 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Social Work/ Practitioner Diaries | 6 years after year to which they relate | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Service user record following no further contact after a decision to close a case or to take no further action | 10 years after closure or 10 years after death | Division best practice | Sample as agreed (see below) | Transfer sample to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Home Care record following no further contact after a decision to close a case or to take no further action | 6 years after closure or 6 years after death | Division best practice | Sample as agreed (see below) | Transfer sample to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Home Care Expense Forms | 12 months | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Home Care Observation Sheets | 2 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Home Care timesheets | 12 months | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Home Care Staff Records | 6 years after leaving at which time a summary record must be kept until the individual’s 70th birthday | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Meals on Wheels | 1 year | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Adult with MH involvement on SW record | 20 years after date of last contact or 10 years after the person’s death if sooner. Records may be kept for 30 years before review but after first 20 years records may be summarised and kept in the summary format for the further 10 years | Division best practice. When records come to the end of their retention period they must be reviewed not automatically destroyed. Such review must take account of any genetic implications of the patient’s illness. If it is decided to retain the records they must be subject to regular review | Sample as agreed (see below) | Transfer sample to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| Deceased Person – after death | 10 years | Division best practice | Sample as agreed (see below) | Transfer sample to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention |
| MAR Sheets | 7 years | Department of Health best practice | No | Destroy |
| Registration & Inspection Reports and correspondence | 5 years | Division best practice | No | Destroy |
| Details | Minimum Retention Period | Rationale | PRA selection | Final action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate and Partnerships: Contracts files | 10 years after termination of contract | Division best practice | Selected: contract files relating to care delivery, pending PRO review at end of retention period. Not selected: contract files relating to secondary functions such as cleaning and maintenance. | Selected files: Review with the Public Record Office to select which should be permanently preserved. Transfer selected records to the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention. Not selected: destroy at end of retention period |
| Corporate and Partnerships: Grants files | 10 years after termination of Grant | Division best practice | No | Destroy at end of retention period |
| Corporate and Partnerships: Grant minutes | 10 years after termination of Grant | Division best practice | Permanent | Transfer to PRO at 25 years |
| Details | Minimum Retention Period | Rationale | PRA selection | Final action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All records including: Log books; Life Histories Nursing Notes; Therapeutic Work Educational Documentation Staff Records | To be returned to Adult Services Central record following no further contact/closure after 3 months | Division best practice as defined in the contract | Review | Review jointly with the Public Record Office after 25 years for permanent retention. Same final action (transfer to the Public Record Office or destroy) as the main Adult’s record. |
| Task | Chair Time (in mins) | Panel Members (x 02) Time (in mins) |
|---|---|---|
| Advert | 30 | - |
| Panel arrangements | 30 | - |
| Shortlisting | 150 | 150 |
| Interview prep | 60 | 60 |
| Interviews | 450 | 450 |
| Post interview admin | 150 | - |
| Feedback to candidates | 225 | 225 |
| Confirmation of appointment and allocation to post | 60 | - |
| Per recruitment for 15 candidates | £347.66 | (£220.51*2) £441.02 |
| Per recruitment for 15 candidates | £788.69 | |
| Per recruitment for one candidate1 | (£788.69/15) £52.58 |
| Task | Time (in minutes) |
|---|---|
| Advert | 30 |
| Interview Invites | 15 |
| Offer of Appointment | 60 |
| DBS | 60 |
| Medicals | 15 |
| References | 30 |
| Manual Applications | 20 |
| Logging Criteria | 30 |
| Pending Chasers | 60 |
| Confirmation of Appointment | 30 |
| Average total per vacancy | 350 |
| Per vacancy2 | £70.00 |
| FOI Request Reference | Date FOI received | Question(s) |
|---|---|---|
| 805565 | 29/04/2019 (Rejected) | A current list of all medical prescribing practitioners A current list of all medical prescribing practitioners 2018/19 on the Isle of Man |
| 817068 | 13/05/2019 | Orthodonic Care - PRIMARY CARE 1. How many orthodontists and consultants work within primary care in the periods 2017 - 2018 and 2018 - 2019? 2. What is the annual salary paid to these individuals, for both primary and secondary care in the periods 2017 - 2018 and 2018 - 2019? 3. Are travel and accommodation paid by the department for visiting orthodontic consultants? 4. Can the department provide figures for travel and accommodation for the visiting consultants both sets of figures broken down for 2018 -2019? 5. Can you provide a copy of the job description, advert and contract, terms upon which these visiting orthodontic consultants are employed or self employed? |
| 1007649 | 15/10/2019 | Information on the appointment of Dental Officer in the Isle of Man 1. What date did the department appoint the dental officer in 2019? 2. Name of the dental officer appointed by the department? 3. What date and at where was the venue of the meeting for selection of the dental officer was held and a copy of all notes from the meeting and names individuals who were in attendance? 4. Copy of the selection criteria any, any notes made at the meeting unredacted 5. Which individuals were responsible for the selection and appointment of the dental officer? 6. What clinical experience in dentistry did the individuals hold? 7. What training and past experience of procurement of health care professionals did the individuals responsible have? Please provide evidence of their training post graduate education. 8. How many dentist applied for the position? For each individual dentist that applied please provide or confirm: A) Year of qualification B) University of qualification C) Relevant qualification obtained in dentistry D) Copies of all post graduate education, certificates, diplomas and masters held 9. Confirm the number of dentists who were interviewed for the position of dental officer? |
| 10. What were the names of the individuals who completed the interviews? 11. On what date were the interviews held? Please provide a copy of the notes from the meeting 12. Please provide a copy of the tender for the position of dental officer 13. Please provide copies of the responses provided by the individual dentists that applied for the position of dental officer (relevant redaction of personal information to be respected) 14. Please provide a copy of the 'marks' or scores provided by the selection committee to the individual tenders 15. What were the names of the individuals who marked the tender documentation? Please provide their individual qualifications including their clinical education or procurement with the relevant proof to confirm this 16. Copy of the marking scheme used by the individuals in providing the relevant 'scores' per question and the policy and procedure document explaining how these scores are interpreted and applied 17. Please provide a copy of the policy document from procurement or the Department of Health in respect of auditing of the tenders including the methodology i.e. Who and how often is the marking checked to ensure there are no errors? 18. How often is an audit completed on tender applications, the subsequent marking to ensure quality assurance, fairness and accountability? 19. What were the names of the individuals within the department wrote the tender document? 20. Was the tender document from a national model or was it tailor made to suit the position? 21. Was the tender document checked by any legal or regulatory body on the Isle of Man or in the UK? | ||
|---|---|---|
| Internal review request (ref: 1007649) (ref: 1089763) | 9/12/2019 | Details: I requested information from Dept Health about the Dental Officer Procurement Procedure. A number of my questions have not been answered. I would like this to be reviewed I have a number of comments to make in respect of the information received see below: 1. Please provide a copy of the notifications if the support service dated 8 Aug 2. Please provide a copy of the letter/email withdrawing application. Please provide name of bidder who withdrew application 3. Please provide names of individuals who were in attendance at the selection process they have failed to answer my question 5. Failed to respond with the government officials included 6. Not answered what dental experience they had. I also requested what clinical dental or relevant qualifications the selection team had. Please provide confirmation that both service providers were practicing dentists within the NHS. The year of qualification and confirmation of GDC registration 9. Who interviewed for the service providers job |
| 13. Please provide copies of responses for the service provider position 15. They failed to name the government officials who were responsible for the marking 17. Please advise why no policy or audit exists in providing procurement exercises 19. I requested the name of the individuals not the department. Please answer the question | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1094861 | 11/12/2019 | Maxillofacial 1. How many maxillofacial surgeons are employed by the government and work within the oral surgery department? 2. How long is the waiting list for a consultation both routine and urgent? 3. How long is the waiting list for treatment both routine and urgent? 4. How many referrals were received by the oral surgery department in 2017, 2018 and 2019? 5. Please provide the source of referrals for 2017, 2018 and 2019 with a breakdown of numbers i.e general dental practioners A&E doctors? 7. How many extractions ( adults) are referred by community dental service, on a monthly basis to the oral surgery department please provide monthly totals? 8. How many children were referred to the oral surgery department for extractions on a monthly basis 2017, 2018, 2019? 9. How many general anesthetic cases were performed on children for extractions at Nobles in 2017, 2018, 2019 ? 10. What is the policy that the department adopts on the performance of general anesthetics and decay i.e does the department follow a policy that if a child is put to sleep i.e has a general anesthetic , the child should wake up decay free i.e all decayed teeth should be extracted |
| 1096061 | 11/12/2019 | Community Dental Services 1. How many individuals are employed by the community dental service? Please provide numbers and whether full or part time include dentist, dental nurses, hygienists, therapists, reception administrative and clerical staff 2. What were the gross wages for all of the above staff during 2016 -2017, 2017-2018, 2019 to date? 3. What are the individual salaries paid to the dentists ? 4. Provide a copy of the individual contracts of the dentists employed in the community dental service and their job descriptions 5. Please provide a full breakdown of accounts profit and loss for the community dental service 2016 - 2017. 2017- 2018 2018 -2019 to date 6. How many individual patients were seen on a monthly basis by the community dentists 2017 - 2018 2018 -2019? 7. What fees were collected by the community dental services from patients for dental treatment in the years 2016-2017. 2017-2018, 2018 - 2019. 8. How many patients remain on the community dental services list as of 1 December 2019? after the contract for general dental services was given to Regent Dental |
| Services in April 2018. Is it correct that patients from the community dental services were transferred to them? 9. What is the remit of the community dental service with regard to patients? 10. Which groups do the community dental services treat? 11. How do the community dental services receive referrals? 12. Please provide the number of referrals to the community dental services for the years 2016 - 2017, 2017 - 2018, 2018-2019 and 2019 to date | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1106161 | 17/12/2019 | NHS Dental Services Budget in General Dental Services 1. What was the gross amount spent on NHS dentistry in GDS for the years 2016- 2017, 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019 to date? 2. Of this gross amount what amount was paid by the patients in each year? 3. What was the net amount spent on NHS dentistry in GDS by the govt per annum? ie Gross amount less patients charges. resulting in the net amount spent on NHS dentistry by the government. 2016- 2017 2017-2018, 2018-2019,2019- to date? 4. Exemption from payment exists for patients under the GDS. What was the sum paid annually by the government for these exempt patients. Please divide the gross payment down into each Exemption category Ie Child under 16, Income support, Pensionable age etc In order to demonstrate the annual sum 5. What % of exempt patients are treated under GDS contract? 6. How does the % in question 5 compare with UK by category ? 7. How is exemption checked and audited by the Department to ascertain exemption ? 8. What was the gross amount spent on Orthodontics including any work through Nobles Hospital,. Provide a breakdown of the gross amount spent for Consultants and the primary Orthodontic contract for the years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019 to date? 9. How many assessments were completed under the primary orthodontic contract (1 UOA ) for the above dates How many Assessments and Treat = 21 UOA were completed per annum for the above dates How many Assessments and treat = 4 UOA were completed for the above dates What is the value of the UOA on island? How does this compare to UK? 9. How many patients are at present on the orthodontic waiting list 10. What is the gross amount spent by the government on NHS dentistry per annum to include Oral surgery Department Nobles Hopsital, Community Dental Services, Emergency Dental Clinics weekends, bank |
| FOI Request Reference | Date FOI received | Question(s) |
|---|---|---|
| 805565 | 29/04/2019 (Rejected) | A current list of all medical prescribing practitioners A current list of all medical prescribing practitioners 2018/19 on the Isle of Man |
| 817068 | 13/05/2019 | Orthodonic Care - PRIMARY CARE 1. How many orthodontists and consultants work within primary care in the periods 2017 - 2018 and 2018 - 2019? 2. What is the annual salary paid to these individuals, for both primary and secondary care in the periods 2017 - 2018 and 2018 - 2019? 3. Are travel and accommodation paid by the department for visiting orthodontic consultants? 4. Can the department provide figures for travel and accommodation for the visiting consultants both sets of figures broken down for 2018 -2019? 5. Can you provide a copy of the job description, advert and contract, terms upon which these visiting orthodontic consultants are employed or self employed? |
| 1007649 | 15/10/2019 | Information on the appointment of Dental Officer in the Isle of Man 1. What date did the department appoint the dental officer in 2019? 2. Name of the dental officer appointed by the department? 3. What date and at where was the venue of the meeting for selection of the dental officer was held and a copy of all notes from the meeting and names individuals who were in attendance? 4. Copy of the selection criteria any, any notes made at the meeting unredacted 5. Which individuals were responsible for the selection and appointment of the dental officer? 6. What clinical experience in dentistry did the individuals hold? 7. What training and past experience of procurement of health care professionals did the individuals responsible have? Please provide evidence of their training post graduate education. 8. How many dentist applied for the position? For each individual dentist that applied please provide or confirm: A) Year of qualification B) University of qualification C) Relevant qualification obtained in dentistry D) Copies of all post graduate education, certificates, diplomas and masters held 9. Confirm the number of dentists who were interviewed for the position of dental officer? |
| 10. What were the names of the individuals who completed the interviews? 11. On what date were the interviews held? Please provide a copy of the notes from the meeting 12. Please provide a copy of the tender for the position of dental officer 13. Please provide copies of the responses provided by the individual dentists that applied for the position of dental officer (relevant redaction of personal information to be respected) 14. Please provide a copy of the 'marks' or scores provided by the selection committee to the individual tenders 15. What were the names of the individuals who marked the tender documentation? Please provide their individual qualifications including their clinical education or procurement with the relevant proof to confirm this 16. Copy of the marking scheme used by the individuals in providing the relevant 'scores' per question and the policy and procedure document explaining how these scores are interpreted and applied 17. Please provide a copy of the policy document from procurement or the Department of Health in respect of auditing of the tenders including the methodology i.e. Who and how often is the marking checked to ensure there are no errors? 18. How often is an audit completed on tender applications, the subsequent marking to ensure quality assurance, fairness and accountability? 19. What were the names of the individuals within the department wrote the tender document? 20. Was the tender document from a national model or was it tailor made to suit the position? 21. Was the tender document checked by any legal or regulatory body on the Isle of Man or in the UK? | ||
|---|---|---|
| Internal review request (ref: 1007649) (ref: 1089763) | 9/12/2019 | Details: I requested information from Dept Health about the Dental Officer Procurement Procedure. A number of my questions have not been answered. I would like this to be reviewed I have a number of comments to make in respect of the information received see below: 1. Please provide a copy of the notifications if the support service dated 8 Aug 2. Please provide a copy of the letter/email withdrawing application. Please provide name of bidder who withdrew application 3. Please provide names of individuals who were in attendance at the selection process they have failed to answer my question 5. Failed to respond with the government officials included 6. Not answered what dental experience they had. I also requested what clinical dental or relevant qualifications the selection team had. Please provide confirmation that both service providers were practicing dentists within the NHS. The year of qualification and confirmation of GDC registration 9. Who interviewed for the service providers job |
| 13. Please provide copies of responses for the service provider position 15. They failed to name the government officials who were responsible for the marking 17. Please advise why no policy or audit exists in providing procurement exercises 19. I requested the name of the individuals not the department. Please answer the question | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1094861 | 11/12/2019 | Maxillofacial 1. How many maxillofacial surgeons are employed by the government and work within the oral surgery department? 2. How long is the waiting list for a consultation both routine and urgent? 3. How long is the waiting list for treatment both routine and urgent? 4. How many referrals were received by the oral surgery department in 2017, 2018 and 2019? 5. Please provide the source of referrals for 2017, 2018 and 2019 with a breakdown of numbers i.e general dental practioners A&E doctors? 7. How many extractions ( adults) are referred by community dental service, on a monthly basis to the oral surgery department please provide monthly totals? 8. How many children were referred to the oral surgery department for extractions on a monthly basis 2017, 2018, 2019? 9. How many general anesthetic cases were performed on children for extractions at Nobles in 2017, 2018, 2019 ? 10. What is the policy that the department adopts on the performance of general anesthetics and decay i.e does the department follow a policy that if a child is put to sleep i.e has a general anesthetic , the child should wake up decay free i.e all decayed teeth should be extracted |
| 1096061 | 11/12/2019 | Community Dental Services 1. How many individuals are employed by the community dental service? Please provide numbers and whether full or part time include dentist, dental nurses, hygienists, therapists, reception administrative and clerical staff 2. What were the gross wages for all of the above staff during 2016 -2017, 2017-2018, 2019 to date? 3. What are the individual salaries paid to the dentists ? 4. Provide a copy of the individual contracts of the dentists employed in the community dental service and their job descriptions 5. Please provide a full breakdown of accounts profit and loss for the community dental service 2016 - 2017. 2017- 2018 2018 -2019 to date 6. How many individual patients were seen on a monthly basis by the community dentists 2017 - 2018 2018 -2019? 7. What fees were collected by the community dental services from patients for dental treatment in the years 2016-2017. 2017-2018, 2018 - 2019. 8. How many patients remain on the community dental services list as of 1 December 2019? after the contract for general dental services was given to Regent Dental |
| Services in April 2018. Is it correct that patients from the community dental services were transferred to them? 9. What is the remit of the community dental service with regard to patients? 10. Which groups do the community dental services treat? 11. How do the community dental services receive referrals? 12. Please provide the number of referrals to the community dental services for the years 2016 - 2017, 2017 - 2018, 2018-2019 and 2019 to date | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1106161 | 17/12/2019 | NHS Dental Services Budget in General Dental Services 1. What was the gross amount spent on NHS dentistry in GDS for the years 2016- 2017, 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019 to date? 2. Of this gross amount what amount was paid by the patients in each year? 3. What was the net amount spent on NHS dentistry in GDS by the govt per annum? ie Gross amount less patients charges. resulting in the net amount spent on NHS dentistry by the government. 2016- 2017 2017-2018, 2018-2019,2019- to date? 4. Exemption from payment exists for patients under the GDS. What was the sum paid annually by the government for these exempt patients. Please divide the gross payment down into each Exemption category Ie Child under 16, Income support, Pensionable age etc In order to demonstrate the annual sum 5. What % of exempt patients are treated under GDS contract? 6. How does the % in question 5 compare with UK by category ? 7. How is exemption checked and audited by the Department to ascertain exemption ? 8. What was the gross amount spent on Orthodontics including any work through Nobles Hospital,. Provide a breakdown of the gross amount spent for Consultants and the primary Orthodontic contract for the years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019 to date? 9. How many assessments were completed under the primary orthodontic contract (1 UOA ) for the above dates How many Assessments and Treat = 21 UOA were completed per annum for the above dates How many Assessments and treat = 4 UOA were completed for the above dates What is the value of the UOA on island? How does this compare to UK? 9. How many patients are at present on the orthodontic waiting list 10. What is the gross amount spent by the government on NHS dentistry per annum to include Oral surgery Department Nobles Hopsital, Community Dental Services, Emergency Dental Clinics weekends, bank |
| Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Cost 13-14 | Total Cost 14-15 | Total Cost 15-16 | Total Cost 16-17 | |
| Agency | £5,705,538.00 | £8,864,979.00 | £14,865,787.79 | £14,781,712.14 |
| Bank/locum | £7,326,862.00 | £7,458,431.00 | £9,562,987.48 | £10,507,610.28 |
| Total | £13,032,400.00 | £16,323,410.00 | £24,428,775.27 | £25,289,322.42 |
| Year 5 | Year 6 | Year 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Cost 17-18 | Total Cost 18-19 | Total Cost 19-12 to 31-12-19 | |
| Agency | £12,567,995.90 | £12,316,950.96 | £8,417,091.00 |
| Bank/locum | £10,204,927.72 | £12,016,997.83 | £9,728,603.00 |
| Total | £22,772,923.62 | £24,333,948.79 | £18,145,694.00 |
| AX BH Report | Total | Budget |
|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2015 – 31/03/2016 | £125,265.52 | £60,000.00 |
| 01/04/2016 – 31/03/2017 | £126,928.29 | £120,000.00 |
| 01/04/2017 – 31/03/2018 | £121,130.17 | £125,000.00 |
| 01/04/2018 – 31/03/2019 | £117,352.20 | £120,000.00 |
| 01/04/2019 – 31/03/2020 | £125,337.90 | £125,000.00 |
| AX BH Report | Total | Budget |
|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2015 - 31/03/2016 | £340,984.50 | £281,800.00 |
| 01/04/2016 - 31/03/2017 | £355,296.71 | £353,380.00 |
| 01/04/2017 - 31/03/2018 | £378,908.52 | £384,970.00 |
| 01/04/2018 - 31/03/2019 | £293,719.93 | £383,290.00 |
| 01/04/2019 - 31/03/2020 | £190,308.00 | £273,590.00 |
| Year | Between Home and Noble's/Ramsey | Between Home and Sea/Airport |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4,097 | 3,107 |
| 2016 | 3,598 | 3,416 |
| 2017 | 3,277 | 3,470 |
| 2018 | 3,982 | 3,539 |
| 2019 | 5,829 | 3,333 |
| Clinical & Public Health Working Group | |
|---|---|
| Name | Title |
| Dr Rosalind Ranson | Medical Director |
| Dr Keith Daniels | General Practitioner |
| Dr John Snelling | General Practitioner |
| Dr Helen Freer | General Practitioner |
| Dr Johnathan Wilmott | General Practitioner |
| Dr Epha Crofts | Consultant, Occupational Health |
| Dr Henrietta Ewart | Direct of Public Health |
| Dr Adrian Dashfield | Consultant Anaesthetist |
| Dr Gareth Davies] | Emergency Medicine |
| Dr David Highley | Consultant Anaesthetist |
| Dr Rizwan Khan | Consultant Microbiologist |
| Dr Ishaku Pam | Consultant Physician |
| Dr Tony Stock | Consultant Obs & Gynae |
| Dr Chris Till | Consultant Anaesthetist |
| Dr Neel Umapathy | Consultant ENT |
| Dr Ian Wright | Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon |
| Dr Chris Waldrum | General Practitioner |
| Cath Quilliam | Director of Nursing |
| Dr Marina Hudson | Consultant Psychiatrist |
| Clinical & Public Health Working Group | |
|---|---|
| Name | Title |
| Dr Rosalind Ranson | Medical Director |
| Dr Keith Daniels | General Practitioner |
| Dr John Snelling | General Practitioner |
| Dr Helen Freer | General Practitioner |
| Dr Johnathan Wilmott | General Practitioner |
| Dr Epha Crofts | Consultant, Occupational Health |
| Dr Henrietta Ewart | Direct of Public Health |
| Dr Adrian Dashfield | Consultant Anaesthetist |
| Dr Gareth Davies] | Emergency Medicine |
| Dr David Highley | Consultant Anaesthetist |
| Dr Rizwan Khan | Consultant Microbiologist |
| Dr Ishaku Pam | Consultant Physician |
| Dr Tony Stock | Consultant Obs & Gynae |
| Dr Chris Till | Consultant Anaesthetist |
|---|---|
| Dr Neel Umapathy | Consultant ENT |
| Dr Ian Wright | Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon |
| Dr Chris Waldrum | General Practitioner |
| Cath Quilliam | Director of Nursing |
| Dr Marina Hudson | Consultant Psychiatrist |
| Dr Henritta Ewart | Director of Public Health |
|---|---|
| Dr Adrian Dashfield | Consultant Anaesthetist |
| Dr Gareth Davies | Emergency Medicine |
| Dr David Highley | Consultant Anaesthetist |
| Dr Rizwan Khan | Consultant Microbiologist |
| Dr Ishaku Pam | Consultant Physician |
| Dr Tony Stock | Consultant Obs and Gynae |
| Dr Chris Till | Consultant Anaesthetist |
| Dr Neel Umapathy | Consultant ENT |
| Dr Ian Wright | Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon |
| Dr Chris Waldrum | General Practitioner |
| Cath Quilliam | Director of Nursing |
| Dr Marina Hudson | Consultant Psychiatrist |
| Performance Period | Registrations | Logins | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Unique Young Person (YP) | ||
| Q1 2019-2020 | 91 | 394 | 91 |
| Q2 2019-2020 | 70 | 723 | 79 |
| Q3 2019-2020 | 72 | 427 | 82 |
| Q4 20129-2020 | 136 | 871 | 154 |
| 2019/2020 Total | 369 | 2415 | |
| Q1 2020-20201 | 73 | 558 | 98 |
| Quarter | Chat | Message | Articles | Forums | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019- 2020 | Sessions | Unique YP (Per Qtr) | Messages | Unique YP | Views | Unique YP | Views | Unique YP |
| 1 | 20 | 15 | 140 | 34 | 107 | 35 | 260 | 44 |
| 2 | 52 | 20 | 330 | 35 | 151 | 32 | 384 | 43 |
| 3 | 34 | 25 | 221 | 53 | 140 | 40 | 264 | 45 |
| 4 | 45 | 31 | 419 | 89 | 876 | 56 | 1322 | 57 |
| 151 | 1110 | 1274 | 2230 | |||||
| 2020- 2021 | ||||||||
| 1 | 24 | 15 | 232 | 57 | 388 | 33 | 411 | 41 |
| Quarter | Top 3 most prominent issues service users presented (in order 1, 2, 3) |
|---|---|
| Q1 2019-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Suicidal Thoughts; Self Worth |
| Q2 2019-2020 | Suicidal Thoughts; Anxiety/stress; Self-harm; loneliness; Friendships |
| Q3 2019-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Suicidal thoughts; Friendships |
| Q4 20129-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Sleep difficulties; Self-harm |
| Q1 2020-20201 | Suicidal Thoughts; Anxiety/stress; Body Image |
| Performance Period | Registrations | Logins | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Unique Person | ||
| Q1 2019-2020 | 386 | 1345 | 391 |
| Q2 2019-2020 | 334 | 1901 | 377 |
| Q3 2019-2020 | 209 | 1489 | 263 |
| Q4 20129-2020 | 198 | 1348 | 248 |
| 2019/2020 Total | 1127 | 6083 | |
| Q1 2020-20201 | 171 | 1564 | 223 |
| Quarter | CHAT | Message | Articles | Forums | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019- 2020 | Sess- ions | Unique Users (Per Qtr) | Mess- ages | Unique Users | Views | Unique Users | Views | Unique Users |
| 1 | 109 | 50 | 245 | 52 | 450 | 152 | 395 | 131 |
| 2 | 236 | 90 | 530 | 97 | 460 | 158 | 661 | 167 |
| 3 | 215 | 70 | 521 | 71 | 365 | 123 | 494 | 119 |
| 4 | 129 | 52 | 297 | 56 | 414 | 132 | 462 | 116 |
| 689 | 1593 | 1689 | 2012 | |||||
| 2020- 2021 | ||||||||
| 1 | 165 | 47 | 530 | 79 | 387 | 102 | 717 | 104 |
| Quarter | Top 3 most prominent issues service users presented (in order 1, 2, 3) |
|---|---|
| Q1 2019-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Depression; Family Relationships |
| Q2 2019-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Depression; Self Worth |
| Q3 2019-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Depression; Family Relationships |
| Q4 20129-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Depression; Family Relationships |
| Q1 2020-20201 | Anxiety/Stress; Depression; Family Relationships |
| Performance Period | Registrations | Logins | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Unique Young Person (YP) | ||
| Q1 2019-2020 | 91 | 394 | 91 |
| Q2 2019-2020 | 70 | 723 | 79 |
| Q3 2019-2020 | 72 | 427 | 82 |
| Q4 20129-2020 | 136 | 871 | 154 |
| 2019/2020 Total | 369 | 2415 | |
| Q1 2020-20201 | 73 | 558 | 98 |
| Quarter | Chat | Message | Articles | Forums | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019- 2020 | Sessions | Unique YP (Per Qtr) | Messages | Unique YP | Views | Unique YP | Views | Unique YP |
| 1 | 20 | 15 | 140 | 34 | 107 | 35 | 260 | 44 |
| 2 | 52 | 20 | 330 | 35 | 151 | 32 | 384 | 43 |
| 3 | 34 | 25 | 221 | 53 | 140 | 40 | 264 | 45 |
| 4 | 45 | 31 | 419 | 89 | 876 | 56 | 1322 | 57 |
| 151 | 1110 | 1274 | 2230 | |||||
| 2020- 2021 | ||||||||
| 1 | 24 | 15 | 232 | 57 | 388 | 33 | 411 | 41 |
| Quarter | Top 3 most prominent issues service users presented (in order 1, 2, 3) |
|---|---|
| Q1 2019-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Suicidal Thoughts; Self Worth |
| Q2 2019-2020 | Suicidal Thoughts; Anxiety/stress; Self-harm; loneliness; Friendships |
| Q3 2019-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Suicidal thoughts; Friendships |
| Q4 20129-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Sleep difficulties; Self-harm |
| Q1 2020-20201 | Suicidal Thoughts; Anxiety/stress; Body Image |
| Performance Period | Registrations | Logins | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Unique Person | ||
| Q1 2019-2020 | 386 | 1345 | 391 |
| Q2 2019-2020 | 334 | 1901 | 377 |
| Q3 2019-2020 | 209 | 1489 | 263 |
| Q4 20129-2020 | 198 | 1348 | 248 |
| 2019/2020 Total | 1127 | 6083 | |
| Q1 2020-20201 | 171 | 1564 | 223 |
| Quarter | CHAT | Message | Articles | Forums | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019- 2020 | Sess- ions | Unique Users (Per Qtr) | Mess- ages | Unique Users | Views | Unique Users | Views | Unique Users |
| 1 | 109 | 50 | 245 | 52 | 450 | 152 | 395 | 131 |
| 2 | 236 | 90 | 530 | 97 | 460 | 158 | 661 | 167 |
| 3 | 215 | 70 | 521 | 71 | 365 | 123 | 494 | 119 |
| 4 | 129 | 52 | 297 | 56 | 414 | 132 | 462 | 116 |
| 689 | 1593 | 1689 | 2012 | |||||
| 2020- 2021 | ||||||||
| 1 | 165 | 47 | 530 | 79 | 387 | 102 | 717 | 104 |
| Quarter | Top 3 most prominent issues service users presented (in order 1, 2, 3) |
|---|---|
| Q1 2019-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Depression; Family Relationships |
| Q2 2019-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Depression; Self Worth |
| Q3 2019-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Depression; Family Relationships |
| Q4 20129-2020 | Anxiety/Stress; Depression; Family Relationships |
| Q1 2020-20201 | Anxiety/Stress; Depression; Family Relationships |
Full Response Text
Less than 6 months 6-9 months 9-12 months 12 months + Total 285 56 62 140 543
Question 2 - What is deemed as the average current waiting time & what is classed by IOM Hospital or NHS guidelines as the appropriate waiting time for such a list?
•
The average current waiting time for a colonoscopy to investigate a potential cancer
is less than two weeks.
•
The average current waiting time for a colonoscopy following receipt of a positive
bowel screening test is one week.
•
The average current waiting time for a colonoscopy that is deemed ‘routine’ following
initial outpatient consultation with a Consultant General Surgeon or Consultant
Gastroenterologist is seven months.
The Isle of Man Government does not currently have a waiting time standard for
colonoscopy, however all patients are prioritised on the basis of clinical presentation and all
urgent or cancer related are expedited in order to prevent delay in diagnosis or treatment.
The UK NHS waiting time standard for colonoscopy is 6 weeks – currently 96.1% of patients are receiving their colonoscopy within 6 weeks of referral to endoscopy.
Question 3 - Also how many of these have taken place on a monthly basis for the last 6 months, and what if any plans there are to clear any backlogs?
July 16
August 16
September 16
October 16
November 16
December 16 Colonoscopies undertaken
78
88
98
123
105
75
The Endoscopy Unit has been undertaking additional ‘Waiting List Initiatives’ over the past 12 months in order to reduce the overall endoscopy waiting list – this included:
•
A visiting consultant undertook a number of weekend waiting list initiatives during
early 2016 at Ramsey Cottage Hospital – during the initiative, a total of 30 patients
received their procedure
•
A locum consultant undertook a waiting list initiative every Saturday during
September and October at Ramsey Cottage Hospital – during the initiative a total of
48 patients received their procedure
•
Following the move to the new Endoscopy Unit, productivity has increased by 25%
(i.e. one additional colonoscopy can be performed on a list) due to the flexibility of
the new unit and the faster turnaround of the decontamination process. This can be
Page 2 of 4
FOIA/DHSC/13
observed in the monthly statistics where an increase in activity was observed from September onwards which is when the unit moved.
Plans to increase capacity over the next 12 months include:
•
Employment of Nurse Endoscopist to supplement existing medical endoscopy capacity
•
Increase in Consultant Gastroenterologist sessions within Endoscopy Unit
•
Additional list to take place in Ramsey Cottage Hospital each week from February –
this will increase capacity by 5 colonoscopies per week
•
Further efficiencies on existing lists to be achieved through improvements in pain
management
Your right to request a review
If you are unhappy with this response to your Freedom of Information request, you may ask
us to carry out an internal review of the response, by completing a complaint form and
submitting it electronically or by delivery/post to the FOI Co-ordinator, Department of Health
& Social Care, Chief Executive’s Officer, Crookall House, Demesne Road, Douglas, Isle of
Man, IM1 3QA. An electronic version and paper version of our complaint form can be found
by going to our website https://www.gov.im/about-the-government/freedom-of-
information/how-to-make-a-freedom-of-information-request/
Your review request should explain why you are dissatisfied with this response, and should
be made as soon as practicable. We will respond as soon as the review has been concluded.
If you are not satisfied with the result of the review, you then have the right to appeal to the
Information Commissioner for a decision on;
01.
Whether we have responded to your request for information in accordance with
Part 2 of the Freedom of Information Act; or
02.
Whether we are justified in refusing to give you the information requested.
In response to an application for review, the Information Commissioner may, at any time, attempt to resolve a matter by negotiation, conciliation, mediation or another form of alternative dispute resolution and will have regard to any outcome of this in making any subsequent decision. Further information about Freedom of Information requests can be found on the Information Commissioner’s website at: https://www.inforights.im/information-centre/freedom-of- information
Page 3 of 4
FOIA/DHSC/13
Should you have any queries concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours Sincerely Freedom of Information Team Department of Health and Social Care
Page 4 of 4
FOIA/DHSC/13
Page 2 of 3
FOIA/DHSC/13
Question 3 It states that officers check the financial details provided on the F1 form:
(a) What benefit or income systems are checked to ensure the applications are correct?
(b) What is the total number of F1 forms found to be fraudulent as per Question 1
(c) What is the threshold amount to receive financial assistance?
(a) Officers of the DHSC are only able to carry out limited checks in terms of the financial detail provided - they are able to check if someone is in receipt of benefit. Officers of the DHSC are in communication with the Social Security Division about whether applications in relation to the F1 scheme would sit better with the Social Security Division rather than DHSC.
(b) No F1 forms were found to be fraudulent.
(c) The threshold limits are attached at Annex 2.
Question 4 Provide copies of the financial audits for the years 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 to confirm compliance that the F1 forms are factually correct.
Information not held, you may wish to contact the following Government Department:
Treasury Audit Advisory Division
1st Floor
Government Office
Bucks Road, Douglas
Isle of Man, IM1 3PU
Telephone: +44 1624 686552
However as previously explained the Department is in communication with the Social Security Division to see if processing of F1 applications sits better with that Division.
Question 5 Why does the F1 form state DHSS?
The F1 form held within Family Practitioner Services Section says DHSC rather than DHSS. It is possible that some old forms are held elsewhere and the Division will make reasonable attempts to ensure that anyone holding these forms is provided the most up to date version.
Your right to request a review
If you are unhappy with this response to your Freedom of Information request, you may ask
us to carry out an internal review of the response, by completing a complaint form and
Page 3 of 3
FOIA/DHSC/13
submitting it electronically or by delivery/post to the FOI Co-ordinator, Department of Health
& Social Care, Chief Executive’s Officer, Crookall House, Demesne Road, Douglas, Isle of
Man, IM1 3QA.
An electronic version and paper version of our complaint form can be found by going to our
website https://www.gov.im/about-the-government/freedom-of-information/how-to-make-a-
freedom-of-information-request/
Your review request should explain why you are dissatisfied with this response, and should
be made as soon as practicable. We will respond as soon as the review has been concluded.
If you are not satisfied with the result of the review, you then have the right to appeal to the
Information Commissioner for a decision on;
01. Whether we have responded to your request for information in accordance with Part 2
of the Freedom of Information Act; or
02. Whether we are justified in refusing to give you the information requested.
In response to an application for review, the Information Commissioner may, at any time,
attempt to resolve a matter by negotiation, conciliation, mediation or another form of
alternative dispute resolution and will have regard to any outcome of this in making any
subsequent decision.
Further information about Freedom of Information requests can be found on the Information
Commissioner’s website at: https://www.inforights.im/information-centre/freedom-of-
information.
Should you have any queries concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Yours Sincerely
Freedom of Information Team Department of Health and Social Care
Department of Health & Social Care - Family Practitioner Services - Form F1
Number of F1's received in relation to Dental treatment Number of dental F1s approved Number of dental F1s refused Number of optical F1s received Number of optical F1s approved Number of optical F1s refused Number of claims that were for both dental and opthalmic Number for both applications that were approved Number for both applications that were refused 2012-13 69 51 18 89 67 22 34 25 9 2013-14 117 91 26 119 78 41 39 26 13 2014-15 119 86 33 221 111 110 52 30 22 2015-16 150 117 33 241 129 112 53 34 19 2016-17 to date 155 136 19 159 67 92 40 26 14 F1 – Thresholds to receive financial assistance
Householder
Age
Allowance
A single claimant householder (homeowner)
Age under 60
£105.28
Age over 60
£140.85
Single claimant if not a householder (tenant)
Age under 18
£82.92
Age 18 – 60
£98.76
Age over 60
£120.81
Either a claimant or a partner is:
Age under 60
£165.04
Age over 60
£202.93
Age over 65
£209.27
Threshold per child
Age under 5
£26.08
Age 5 -11
£32.14
Age over 11
£38.20
Capital disregard
Total Above:
13,000.00
“Question 7 - A list of the contractual obligations the supplier/contractor has to fulfil, including a copy of the repairs schedule, and the designated timescale for repair to be completed”
“Question 8 - A copy of the complaints policy identifying how a service user can formally complain about a failure in service in relation to the repair of a wheelchair”
“Question 9 - The contact details of the appropriate person a wheelchair user can contact in relation to the above”
“Question 10 - A copy of the monitoring arrangements in relation to no.7 which are in place to ensure the contractor/ supplier identified in no.6 above is performing” Response to your request We are pleased to be able to provide a response to your request with answers to your questions. Please find enclosed the following Policy: Primary Care Directorate, Community Health Services, Eligibility Criteria and Provision of Wheelchairs and Specialist Seating Version 2.2 June 2016
For ease, I have extrapolated the relevant information or provided reference contained within the attached policy to answer your questions. Question 1 - I would like to have a copy of:-
• the policy for Wheelchair provision – see enclosed
• the policy, procedure and process for repairing prescribed wheelchairs. –
The relevant section of the Wheelchair policy is:
“8. Service and Repair
8.1
The service and repair of each chair is carried out by the DOI, Health at
Noble’s Hospital. This service is accessed via the Wheelchair Service telephone
number and by the user giving the correct asset number to the administrator.
Dependent upon the category of user, the service and repair is prioritised in
accordance with the Healthcare Standards for Wheelchairs 2015 (Appendix 6)”
• the policy, procedure and process for the issue of a replacement/courtesy wheelchair while any repairs are carried out when the individual user is reliant on their wheelchair
Within the enclosed policy please refer to “Section 3. Who is entitled to a wheelchair?”
Page 2 of 5 FOIA/DHSC/12
Question 2 - Please provide a copy of the indemnity policy which waives liability against the DHSC when they leave an individual with an old de-commissioned wheelchair or no wheelchair
The usual process is to remove the unserviceable wheelchair from the user, however if the user has a desire to retain their ‘old’ wheelchair they are required to sign a waiver of liability instructing said user that the wheelchair is decommissioned from service.
Question 3 - The length of time that is considered acceptable for wheelchair repairs to be completed
The relevant section of the Wheelchair policy is:
“Appendix 6 – Response Times (to patient)”
Non-emergency repairs will be completed in:
3 working days
Cat 3 user or if chair is operable and safe without urgent repair
3 working days
Emergency Repairs/Responses will be within:
24 hours
Cat 1, Cat 2 and Cat 4 users where the chair is unsuitable for use without repair
24 hours
Question 4 - The eligibility criteria and process for patients who must be issued with a suitable temporary wheelchair whilst their wheelchair is being repaired
This is completed upon initial assessment dependent upon the needs of the patient.
Question 5 - If a temporary wheelchair is issued please provide a copy of your assessment process which is used to define the type of wheelchair that can be issued to the individual on a temporary basis and what steps are taken to ensure that this wheelchair does not have a detrimental impact on their health and well being
This is completed upon initial assessment dependent upon the needs of the patient. Question 6 -Does the DHSC use any third party contractors to repair wheelchairs? If so which?
The relevant section of the Wheelchair policy is:
“8.
Service and Repair
8.1
The service and repair of each chair is carried out by the DOI, Health at
Noble’s Hospital. This service is accessed via the Wheelchair Service telephone
Page 3 of 5 FOIA/DHSC/12
number and by the user giving the correct asset number to the administrator. Dependent upon the category of user, the service and repair is prioritised in accordance with the Healthcare Standards for Wheelchairs 2015 (Appendix 6)”
Question 7 - A list of the contractual obligations the supplier/contractor has to fulfil, including a copy of the repairs schedule, and the designated timescale for repair to be completed
Within the enclosed policy please refer to “Appendix 6 – Response Times (to patient)”
Question 8 - A copy of the complaints policy identifying how a service user can formally complain about a failure in service in relation to the repair of a wheelchair
The following link provided below explains the Departments complaints procedure.
https://www.gov.im/about-the-government/departments/health-and-social-care/complaints- and-compliments/
All compliments/complaints are directed to the address below:
Department of Health and Social Care Crookall House Demesne Road Douglas Isle of Man IM1 3QA
Telephone: +44 1624 685987 Email: Send Email
[Response truncated — full text is 802,273 characters]