Covid breaches

AuthorityIsle of Man Constabulary
Date received2020-06-05
OutcomeAll information sent
Outcome date2020-06-09
Case ID1321209

Summary

The request asked for the number of Isle of Man police officers warned or disciplined for breaching the Emergency Powers Act during the state of emergency. The Constabulary disclosed that three officers were warned and none were disciplined, noting they were handled similarly to the general public.

Key Facts

  • Three police officers were warned for breaches of the Emergency Powers Act.
  • Zero police officers were disciplined for such breaches.
  • The officers were dealt with under the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2015.
  • The handling of these officers followed the '4 E's approach' (engaged and educated) used for the public.
  • Approximately 450 members of the public were also warned for similar breaches.

Data Disclosed

  • 3
  • 0
  • 450
  • 2020-06-05
  • 2020-06-09
  • 1321209
  • 2015

Original Request

How many police officers have been (A) warned and (B) disciplined for breaches of the Emergency Powers Act since a state of Emergency was first declared on the Isle of Man. What was the outcome of these incidents.

Data Tables (1)

Full Response Text

Isle of Man Constabulary Freedom of Information Police Headquarters Dukes Avenue Douglas Isle of Man IM2 4RG

Our ref: 1321209 9 June 2020

Dear ###

We write further to your request which was received on 5 June 2020 and which states:

"How many police officers have been (A) warned and (B) disciplined for breaches of the Emergency Powers Act since a state of Emergency was first declared on the Isle of Man. What was the outcome of these incidents."

Our response to your request is as follows: I have detailed below the information that is being released to you. In answer to (A) 3 and in answer to (B) 0. The 3 officers identified were assessed and dealt with in line with the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2015, given the nature of the incidents they were dealt with in line with the other 450 members of the public who were warned i.e. the 4 ‘E’s approach, they were engaged and educated, this was recorded as per all other breaches at this level.
Please quote the reference number 1321209 in any future communications.

Your right to request a review

If you are unhappy with this response to your freedom of information request, you may ask us to carry out an internal review of the response, by completing a complaint form and submitting it electronically or by delivery/post.

An electronic version of our complaint form can be found by going to our website at https://services.gov.im/freedom-of-information/Review . If you would like a paper version of our complaint form to be sent to you by post, please contact me and I will be happy to arrange for this. Your review request should explain why you are dissatisfied with this response, and should be made as soon as practicable. We will respond as soon as the review has been concluded.

If you are not satisfied with the result of the review, you then have the right to appeal to the Information Commissioner for a decision on; 1. Whether we have responded to your request for information in accordance with Part 2 of the Freedom of Information Act 2015; or 2. Whether we are justified in refusing to give you the information requested.
In response to an application for review, the Information Commissioner may, at any time, attempt to resolve a matter by negotiation, conciliation, mediation or another form of alternative dispute resolution and will have regard to any outcome of this in making any subsequent decision. More detailed information on your right to a review can be found on the Information Commissioner’s website at www.inforights.im. Should you have any queries concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Further information about freedom of information requests can be found at www.gov.im/foi.

I will now close your request as of this date.

Yours sincerely