Overseas Aid - RNLI
| Authority | Cabinet Office |
|---|---|
| Date received | 2019-11-05 |
| Outcome | Some information sent but part exempt |
| Outcome date | 2019-12-19 |
| Case ID | 1030229 |
Summary
The request sought the paper submitted by the Executive Director regarding Small Grants funding for the 2019-2021 period, specifically referencing an RNLI project. The authority released some information, including the list of approved grants and funding amounts, but withheld specific project details and assessment scores, citing partial exemptions.
Key Facts
- The Cabinet Office approved eight Small Grant applications for the 2019-2021 period.
- The RNLI received £57,855 for a project titled 'SwimSafe'.
- Other funded charities include CAFOD, British Red Cross, and Save the Children.
- The response includes a template for project assessment but redacts specific scoring and rationale for individual applications.
- The outcome was determined as 'Some information sent but part exempt' on 2019-12-19.
Data Disclosed
- 2019-11-05
- 2019-12-19
- £57,855
- £83,977
- £99,000
- £81,989
- £95,029
- £60,000
- £100,000
- SG 0619
- SG 0719
- SG 1019
- SG 1219
- SG 0919
- SG 1119
- SG 0319
- SG 0419
- 468
- £179.44
- £151,219
- £85,609
Original Request
A copy of the paper submitted by the Executive Director, Crown and External Relations referred to in this undated extract from a Minutes of a Department meeting - 049/19 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SMALL GRANTS APPLICATION The Department considered a paper submitted by the Executive Director, Crown and External Relations which sought approval of the Small Grants funding for the 2019-2021 project period. The Department approved the recommendations to approve the following applications for funding as set out in the paper: SG 0719 ' 'Restoring degraded lands to reduce rural poverty in Zimbabwe' Excellent Development Isle of Man Ltd. Requested funding: £83,977 SG 1019 ' 'Access to clean water using solar power for drought-prone pastoralist communities in Afar, Ethiopia' CAFOD. Requested funding: £99,000 SG 0619 'SwimSafe' RNLI. Requested funding: £57,855 SG 1219 ' 'Emergency Obstetrics care for conflict-affected people in Hajjah, Yemen' British Red Cross. Requested funding: £81,989 SG 0919 ' 'Construction of two school buildings and education improvement in Rural Nepali Communities' Pahar Trust. Requested funding: £95,029 SG 1119 ' 'Wheels that heal: Providing mobile health services to marginalised communities, in Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria' The Leprosy Mission of England and Wales. Requested funding: £99,000 The Department also approved to the funding of the following applications in addition to those above: Funding of £60,000 for application SG 0319 'Ikawa N'Inka' by Send a Cow; and Funding of £100,000 for application SG 0419 ' 'Protecting Syrian Children' by Save the Children
Data Tables (46)
| Charity: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Title: | |||||
| Ref No: | |||||
| Requested Donation: | |||||
| Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding: | |||||
| Cost Per Beneficiary: |
| YEAR | AMOUNT | PROJECT TITLE | COMMENTS (RE PROJECT | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) | |||||||||||
| Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration Act 1989? | |||||
| Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle | |||||
| of Man? | |||||
| Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to | |||||
| operate in the country? | |||||
| Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index? | |||||
| If not Low reason for inclusion detailed | |||||
| The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations | |||||
| Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | |||||
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least | |||||
| 10% of total project budget | |||||
| Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit | |||||
| Organisation, if applicable? | |||||
| Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and | |||||
| procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable | |||||
| adults and children? | |||||
| Administrative costs are below 10% | |||||
| Application includes: | |||||
| Project Budget | |||||
| Project Delivery Plan | |||||
| Risk Assessment | |||||
| Communications Plan | |||||
| Safeguarding Plan |
| Ranked 1-5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives | |||||||
| 2 | Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable | |||||||
| 3 | Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed | |||||||
| 4 | The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances | |||||||
| 5 | The Charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place to protect vulnerable people | |||||||
| 6 | The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding | |||||||
| 7 | The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects | |||||||
| 8 | 8 | The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale | ||||||
| of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager | ||||||||
| 9 | A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken | |||||||
| 10 | An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations | |||||||
| 11 | The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding | |||||||
| 12 | 12 | The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate | ||||||
| if not Low development on UN HDI clear reason why it should be considered | ||||||||
| 13 | The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising | |||||||
| awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the | ||||||||
| project location and globally. | ||||||||
| 14 | The project is deliverable within 24 months | |||||||
| 15 | Total |
| Charity: | Excellent Development Isle of Man Ltd | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Title: | Restoring degraded lands to reduce rural poverty in Zimbabwe | Restoring degraded lands to reduce rural poverty in Zimbabwe | |||
| Ref No: | SG 0719 | ||||
| Requested Donation: | £83,977 | ||||
| Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding: | 468 | ||||
| Cost Per Beneficiary: | £179.44 |
| YEAR | AMOUNT | PROJECT TITLE | COMMENTS (RE PROJECT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) | ||||||||
| 2015 - | £151,219 | Creating sustainable lives for people and wildlife. MYG029.15 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||
| 2017 - | £85,609 | Building resilient food and water secure communities in Ukambani, Kenya. SG001.17 | ||||||
| 2019 |
| Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities | Yes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration Act 1989 or Registered with the UK Charity | |||||
| Commission | |||||
| Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle | Yes | ||||
| of Man or has demonstrated links to the Island | |||||
| Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to | Yes | ||||
| operate in the country | |||||
| Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index | Zimbabwe – ranked 156 | ||||
| The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations | SDG6 – Clean water and sanitation | |||
| Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | |||||
| SDG13 – Climate action | |||||
| SDG15 – Life on land | |||||
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least 10% of total project budget | Yes – Additional funding will be provided through | ||||
| Guernsey Overseas Aid to fund this project. | |||||
| Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit | Yes | Yes | |||
| Organisation, if applicable (subject to project location) | |||||
| Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and | Yes | ||||
| procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable | |||||
| adults and children | |||||
| Administrative costs are below 10% | Yes | ||||
| Application includes: | |||||
| Project Budget | Yes | ||||
| Project Delivery Plan | Yes | ||||
| Risk Assessment | Yes | ||||
| Communications Plan | Yes | ||||
| Safeguarding Plan | Yes |
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least |
|---|
| 10% of total project budget |
| Ranked 1-5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives | 4 | ||||||
| 2 | Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable | 5 | ||||||
| 3 | Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed | 4 | ||||||
| 4 | The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances | 5 | ||||||
| 5 | The charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place | 4 | ||||||
| 6 | The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding | 5 | ||||||
| 7 | The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects | 5 | ||||||
| 8 | 8 | The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale | 4 | 4 | ||||
| of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager | ||||||||
| 9 | A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken | 5 | ||||||
| 10 | An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations | 4 | ||||||
| 11 | The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding | 5 | ||||||
| 12 | The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate | 4 | ||||||
| 13 | 13 | The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising | 5 | 5 | ||||
| awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the | ||||||||
| project location and globally. | ||||||||
| 14 | The project is deliverable within 24 months | 4 | ||||||
| 63 |
| Charity: | CAFOD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Title: | Project Title: | Access to clean water using solar power for drought-prone | |||
| pastoralist communities in Afar, Ethiopia | |||||
| Ref No: | SG1714521I | ||||
| Requested Donation: | £99,000.00 | ||||
| Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding: | 7387 | ||||
| Cost Per Beneficiary: | £13.40 |
| YEAR | AMOUNT | PROJECT TITLE | COMMENTS (RE PROJECT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) | ||||||||||
| 2015 | £168,836.00 | Livelihoods and leadership: tackling | ||||||||
| gender inequality and sexual violence | ||||||||||
| Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities | Yes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration Act 1989? | |||||
| Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle | Yes | ||||
| of Man? | |||||
| Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to | Yes | ||||
| operate in the country? | |||||
| Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index? | Yes | ||||
| If not Low reason for inclusion detailed | |||||
| The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations | Yes, SDG6 (clean water and sanitation) and SDG7 | |||
| Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | |||||
| (affordable and clean energy) | |||||
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least | Yes | Yes | |||
| 10% of total project budget | |||||
| Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit | No (were registered, but advised to de-register) | ||||
| Organisation, if applicable? | |||||
| Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and | Yes | ||||
| procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable | |||||
| adults and children? | |||||
| Administrative costs are below 10% | Yes | ||||
| Application includes: | |||||
| Project Budget | Yes to all | ||||
| Project Delivery Plan | |||||
| Risk Assessment | |||||
| Communications Plan | |||||
| Safeguarding Plan | |||||
| Ranked 1-5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives | 5 | ||||||
| 2 | Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable | 4 | ||||||
| 3 | Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed | 4 | ||||||
| 4 | The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances | 4 | ||||||
| 5 | The Charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place to protect vulnerable people | 5 | ||||||
| 6 | The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding | 5 | ||||||
| 7 | The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects | 5 | ||||||
| 8 | 8 | The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale | 5 | 5 | ||||
| of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager | ||||||||
| 9 | A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken | 3 | ||||||
| 10 | An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations | 5 | ||||||
| 11 | The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding | 4 | ||||||
| 12 | 12 | The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate | 5 | 5 | ||||
| if not Low development on UN HDI clear reason why it should be considered | ||||||||
| 13 | The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising | 4 | ||||||
| awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the | ||||||||
| project location and globally. | ||||||||
| 14 | The project is deliverable within 24 months | 4 | ||||||
| 15 | Total | 62 |
| Charity: | RNLI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Title: | SwimSafe | SwimSafe | |||
| Ref No: | SG 0619 | ||||
| Requested Donation: | £57,855 | ||||
| Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding: | 30,110 | ||||
| Cost Per Beneficiary: | £1.92 |
| YEAR | AMOUNT | PROJECT TITLE | COMMENTS (RE PROJECT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) | ||||||||||
| Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities | Yes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration Act 1989 or Registered with the UK Charity | |||||
| Commission | |||||
| Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle | Yes | ||||
| of Man or has demonstrated links to the Island | |||||
| Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to | Yes | ||||
| operate in the country | |||||
| Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index | Bangladesh – Ranked 136 | ||||
| The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations | SDG1 – No poverty | |||
| Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | |||||
| SDG3 – Good health and wellbeing | |||||
| SDG4 – Quality education | |||||
| SDG5 – Gender equality | |||||
| SDG8 – Decent work and economic growth | |||||
| SDG13 – Climate action | |||||
| SDG16 – Peace, justice and strong institutions | |||||
| SDG17 – Partnership for the goals | |||||
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least | Yes – further funding can be covered by RNLI resources | Yes – further funding can be covered by RNLI resources | |||
| 10% of total project budget | |||||
| Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit | N/A | ||||
| Organisation, if applicable (subject to project location) | |||||
| Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and | Yes | ||||
| procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable | |||||
| adults and children | |||||
| Administrative costs are below 10% | Yes | ||||
| Application includes: | |||||
| Project Budget | Yes | ||||
| Project Delivery Plan | Yes |
| Risk Assessment | Yes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communications Plan | Yes | ||||
| Safeguarding Plan | Yes |
| Ranked 1-5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives | 5 | ||||||
| 2 | Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable | 4 | ||||||
| 3 | Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed | 4 | ||||||
| 4 | The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances | 5 | ||||||
| 5 | The charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place | 4 | ||||||
| 6 | The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding | 5 | ||||||
| 7 | The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects | 4 | ||||||
| 8 | 8 | The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale | 5 | 5 | ||||
| of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager | ||||||||
| 9 | A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken | 4 | ||||||
| 10 | An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations | 4 | ||||||
| 11 | The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding | 4 | ||||||
| 12 | The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate | 4 | ||||||
| 13 | 13 | The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising | 4 | 4 | ||||
| awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the | ||||||||
| project location and globally. | ||||||||
| 14 | The project is deliverable within 24 months | 5 | ||||||
| 61 |
| Charity: | British Red Cross | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Title: | Project Title: | Emergency Obstetrics care for conflict-affected people in | |||
| Hajjah, Yemen | |||||
| Ref No: | SG171539I | ||||
| Requested Donation: | £81,989.00 | ||||
| Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding: | 1050 | ||||
| Cost Per Beneficiary: | £78.08 |
| YEAR | AMOUNT | PROJECT TITLE | COMMENTS (RE PROJECT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) | |||||||
| 2017 | £69,765 | Preparing for and responding to cyclical | Trouble registering with the FSA meant the start date of the project was delayed. | Trouble registering with the FSA meant | |||
| shocks (extreme | the start date of the project was delayed. | ||||||
| weather, economic and political) in | |||||||
| Chipinge and Mwenzi, | |||||||
| including diversifying food and income | |||||||
| opportunities | |||||||
| 2015 | £273,667.00 | Sierra Leone Community Based Health | Financial capability issue with their | ||||
| and Ebola Recovery Programme | partner slowed the project down |
| Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities | Yes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration Act 1989? | |||||
| Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle | Yes | ||||
| of Man? | |||||
| Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to | Yes | ||||
| operate in the country? | |||||
| Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index? | Yes | ||||
| If not Low reason for inclusion detailed | |||||
| The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations | Yes, SDG3 (good health and well-being), SDG5 (gender | |||
| Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | |||||
| equality) | |||||
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least | Yes | Yes | |||
| 10% of total project budget | |||||
| Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit | No (advised not to register) | ||||
| Organisation, if applicable? | |||||
| Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and | Yes | ||||
| procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable | |||||
| adults and children? | |||||
| Administrative costs are below 10% | Yes | ||||
| Application includes: | Yes to all | Yes to all | |||
| Project Budget | |||||
| Project Delivery Plan | |||||
| Risk Assessment |
| Communications Plan | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Safeguarding Plan |
| Ranked 1-5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives | 5 | ||||||
| 2 | Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable | 2 | ||||||
| 3 | Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed | 4 | ||||||
| 4 | The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances | 4 | ||||||
| 5 | The Charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place to protect vulnerable people | 5 | ||||||
| 6 | The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding | 5 | ||||||
| 7 | The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects | 5 | ||||||
| 8 | 8 | The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale | 5 | 5 | ||||
| of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager | ||||||||
| 9 | A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken | 4 | ||||||
| 10 | An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations | 5 | ||||||
| 11 | The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding | 4 | ||||||
| 12 | 12 | The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate | 5 | 5 | ||||
| if not Low development on UN HDI clear reason why it should be considered | ||||||||
| 13 | The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising | 4 | ||||||
| awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the | ||||||||
| project location and globally. | ||||||||
| 14 | The project is deliverable within 24 months | 4 | ||||||
| 15 | Total | 61 |
| Charity: | Pahar Trust Nepal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Title: | Project Title: | Construction of two School Buildings and Education | |||
| Improvement in Rural Nepali Communities | |||||
| Ref No: | SG16910I | ||||
| Requested Donation: | £95,029.00 | ||||
| Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding: | 927 | ||||
| Cost Per Beneficiary: | £102.51 |
| YEAR | AMOUNT | PROJECT TITLE | COMMENTS (RE PROJECT | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) | |||||||||||
| 2017 | £82,545 | Construction of two School Buildings to Replace | Delays in completing phase-one of the | ||||||||
| project due to complications caused by | |||||||||||
| heavy rain. | |||||||||||
| There was an overs-pend due to poor | |||||||||||
| weather conditions complicating the | |||||||||||
| transporting of building materials. | |||||||||||
| Construction of two School Buildings to |
|---|
| Replace |
| Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities | IOM registered 987 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration Act 1989? | |||||
| Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle | Yes | ||||
| of Man? | |||||
| Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to | Yes | ||||
| operate in the country? | |||||
| Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index? | yes | ||||
| If not Low reason for inclusion detailed | |||||
| The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations | Yes, SDG1 (No Poverty), SDG4 (Quality Education), SDG8 | |||
| Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | |||||
| (Decent Work and Economic Growth) and SDG10 | |||||
| (Reduced Inequalities) | |||||
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least | Yes | Yes | |||
| 10% of total project budget | |||||
| Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit | Yes | ||||
| Organisation, if applicable? | |||||
| Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and | Yes | ||||
| procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable | |||||
| adults and children? | |||||
| Administrative costs are below 10% | Yes | ||||
| Application includes: | Yes to all | ||||
| Project Budget | |||||
| Project Delivery Plan |
| Risk Assessment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communications Plan | |||||
| Safeguarding Plan |
| Ranked 1-5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives | 5 | ||||||
| 2 | Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable | 4 | ||||||
| 3 | Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed | 5 | ||||||
| 4 | The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances | 3 | ||||||
| 5 | The Charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place to protect vulnerable people | 4 | ||||||
| 6 | The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding | 4 | ||||||
| 7 | The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects | 4 | ||||||
| 8 | 8 | The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale | 4 | 4 | ||||
| of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager | ||||||||
| 9 | A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken | 4 | ||||||
| 10 | An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations | 4 | ||||||
| 11 | The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding | 3 | ||||||
| 12 | 12 | The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate | 5 | 5 | ||||
| if not Low development on UN HDI clear reason why it should be considered | ||||||||
| 13 | The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising | 5 | ||||||
| awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the | ||||||||
| project location and globally. | ||||||||
| 14 | The project is deliverable within 24 months | 4 | ||||||
| 15 | Total | 58 |
| Charity: | The Leprosy Mission of England and Wales | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Title: | Project Title: | Wheels that heal: Providing Mobile Health Services to | |||
| Marginalised Communities, in Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria | |||||
| Ref No: | SG170342I | ||||
| Requested Donation: | £99,000.00 | ||||
| Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding: | 1500 | ||||
| Cost Per Beneficiary: | £66.00 |
| YEAR | AMOUNT | PROJECT TITLE | COMMENTS (RE PROJECT | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) | |||||||||||
| Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities | Yes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration Act 1989? | |||||
| Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle | Yes | ||||
| of Man? | |||||
| Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to | Yes | ||||
| operate in the country? | |||||
| Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index? | Yes | ||||
| If not Low reason for inclusion detailed | |||||
| The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations | Yes, SDG3 (good health and well-being), SDG5 (gender | |||
| Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | |||||
| equality), SDG10 (reduced inequalities) SDG16 (peace, | |||||
| justice and strong institutions) | |||||
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least | Yes | Yes | |||
| 10% of total project budget | |||||
| Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit | Yes | ||||
| Organisation, if applicable? | |||||
| Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and | Yes | ||||
| procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable | |||||
| adults and children? | |||||
| Administrative costs are below 10% | Yes | ||||
| Application includes: | Yes to all | Yes to all | |||
| Project Budget | |||||
| Project Delivery Plan | |||||
| Risk Assessment | |||||
| Communications Plan | |||||
| Safeguarding Plan |
| Ranked 1-5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives | 4 | ||||||
| 2 | Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable | 5 | ||||||
| 3 | Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed | 4 | ||||||
| 4 | The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances | 3 | ||||||
| 5 | The Charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place to protect vulnerable people | 5 | ||||||
| 6 | The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding | 5 | ||||||
| 7 | The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects | 5 | ||||||
| 8 | 8 | The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale | 5 | 5 | ||||
| of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager | ||||||||
| 9 | A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken | 5 | ||||||
| 10 | An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations | 5 | ||||||
| 11 | The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding | 4 | ||||||
| 12 | 12 | The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate | 5 | 5 | ||||
| if not Low development on UN HDI clear reason why it should be considered | ||||||||
| 13 | The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising | 4 | ||||||
| awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the | ||||||||
| project location and globally. | ||||||||
| 14 | The project is deliverable within 24 months | 4 | ||||||
| 15 | Total | 63 |
| Charity: | Send a Cow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Title: | Ikawa N’Inka (“Coffee and Cows”) | Ikawa N’Inka (“Coffee and Cows”) | |||
| Ref No: | SG 0319 | ||||
| Requested Donation: | £60,772 | ||||
| Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding: | 3000 | ||||
| Cost Per Beneficiary: | £20.26 |
| YEAR | AMOUNT | PROJECT TITLE | COMMENTS (RE PROJECT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) | ||||||||
| 2015 - | £63,000 | Hope, Mean, Future. SG015.15 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||||
| 2017 - | £84,874 | Addressing social and economic poverty for vulnerable families in Leribe. MYG033.15 | ||||||
| 2018 |
| Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities | Yes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration Act 1989 or Registered with the UK Charity | |||||
| Commission | |||||
| Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle | Yes | ||||
| of Man or has demonstrated links to the Island | |||||
| Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to | Yes | ||||
| operate in the country | |||||
| Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index | Rwanda ranked 158 | ||||
| The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations | SDG1 - No poverty | |||
| Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | |||||
| SDG2 - Zero hunger | |||||
| SDG5 - Gender equality | |||||
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least 10% of total project budget | Yes – further funding is being sought from corporate | ||||
| donors | |||||
| Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit | Yes | Yes | |||
| Organisation, if applicable (subject to project location) | |||||
| Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and | Yes | ||||
| procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable | |||||
| adults and children | |||||
| Administrative costs are below 10% | Yes | ||||
| Application includes: | |||||
| Project Budget | Yes | ||||
| Project Delivery Plan | Yes | ||||
| Risk Assessment | Yes | ||||
| Communications Plan | Yes | ||||
| Safeguarding Plan | Yes |
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least |
|---|
| 10% of total project budget |
| Ranked 1-5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives | 4 | ||||||
| 2 | Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable | 4 | ||||||
| 3 | Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed | 4 | ||||||
| 4 | The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances | 4 | ||||||
| 5 | The charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place | 4 | ||||||
| 6 | The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding | 5 | ||||||
| 7 | The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects | 5 | ||||||
| 8 | 8 | The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale | 4 | 4 | ||||
| of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager | ||||||||
| 9 | A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken | 4 | ||||||
| 10 | An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations | 4 | ||||||
| 11 | The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding | 4 | ||||||
| 12 | The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate | 4 | ||||||
| 13 | 13 | The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising | 4 | 4 | ||||
| awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the | ||||||||
| project location and globally. | ||||||||
| 14 | The project is deliverable within 24 months | 4 | ||||||
| 58 |
| Charity: | Save the Children | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Title: | Protecting Syrian Children | Protecting Syrian Children | |||
| Ref No: | SG 0419 | ||||
| Requested Donation: | £100,000 | ||||
| Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding: | 3340 | ||||
| Cost Per Beneficiary: | £29.94 |
| YEAR | AMOUNT | PROJECT TITLE | COMMENTS (RE PROJECT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) | ||||||||||
| 2015 - | £63,000 | SHIKHON – Supporting the Hardest to Reach through Basic Education. SG014.15 | ||||||||
| 2016 | ||||||||||
| Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities | Yes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration Act 1989 or Registered with the UK Charity | |||||
| Commission | |||||
| Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle | Yes | ||||
| of Man or has demonstrated links to the Island | |||||
| Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to | Yes | ||||
| operate in the country | |||||
| Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index | Syria – Ranked 155 | ||||
| The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations | SDG3 – Good health and wellbeing | SDG3 – Good health and wellbeing | |||
| Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed | |||||
| The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least 10% of total project budget | The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least | Yes – The additional funding is likely to come from the | |||
| 10% of total project budget | |||||
| Gwenyth Forrester Trust | |||||
| Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit | N/A | N/A | |||
| Organisation, if applicable (subject to project location) | |||||
| Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and | Yes | ||||
| procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable | |||||
| adults and children | |||||
| Administrative costs are below 10% | Yes | ||||
| Application includes: | |||||
| Project Budget | Yes | ||||
| Project Delivery Plan | Yes | ||||
| Risk Assessment | Yes | ||||
| Communications Plan | Yes | ||||
| Safeguarding Plan | Yes |
| Ranked 1-5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives | 4 | ||||||
| 2 | Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable | 4 | ||||||
| 3 | Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed | 4 | ||||||
| 4 | The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances | 4 | ||||||
| 5 | The charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place | 4 | ||||||
| 6 | The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding | 5 | ||||||
| 7 | The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects | 5 | ||||||
| 8 | 8 | The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale | 5 | 5 | ||||
| of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager | ||||||||
| 9 | A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken | 4 | ||||||
| 10 | An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations | 5 | ||||||
| 11 | The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding | 3 | ||||||
| 12 | The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate | 3 | ||||||
| 13 | 13 | The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising | 4 | 4 | ||||
| awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the | ||||||||
| project location and globally. | ||||||||
| 14 | The project is deliverable within 24 months | 4 | ||||||
| 58 |
| Chief Secretary, Cabinet Office | Mr W Greenhow | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Responsible CO Director | , Executive Director of External Relations | ||
| Date of meeting | 06/03/2019 |
| Has appropriate consultation taken place? | Not applicable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Are there any resource/personnel implications? | Not applicable | ||||
| Are there any inter-Departmental implications? | No | ||||
| If yes, which other Departments are involved? | |||||
| What is the intention of this paper? | Seek Approval | ||||
| Purpose of the Paper: To seek the approval of the Cabinet Office Political Group for the allocation of Small Grants funding for the 2019-2021 project period. |
Full Response Text
1
Isle of Man Government Small Grant funding 2019/2021
Summary of Project Application and Recommendation for Funding
Charity:
Project Title:
Ref No:
Requested Donation:
Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding:
Cost Per Beneficiary:
Details of previous Isle of Man Government funding (past 2 years) YEAR AMOUNT PROJECT TITLE COMMENTS (RE PROJECT DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC)
Essential Eligibility Criteria for Shortlisting
Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities
Registration Act 1989?
Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle of Man?
Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to operate in the country?
Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index? If not Low reason for inclusion detailed
The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed
The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least 10% of total project budget
Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit Organisation, if applicable?
Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable adults and children?
Administrative costs are below 10%
Application includes:
Project Budget
Project Delivery Plan
Risk Assessment
Communications Plan
Safeguarding Plan
2
In addition to the above, the External Relations Team assessed each application using the following criteria:
Ranked 1-5 1 Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives
2 Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable
3 Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed
4 The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances
5 The Charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place to protect vulnerable people
6 The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding
7 The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects
8 The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager
9 A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken
10 An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations
11 The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding
12 The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate if not Low development on UN HDI clear reason why it should be considered
13 The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the project location and globally.
14 The project is deliverable within 24 months
15 Total
1 does not meet
2 meets in part but many ommissions
3 meets but with some deficiency
4 meets but small deficiency
5 meets completely
Project Goals/ Summary
Location overview
FSA Ranking -
Initial comments
Rationale for funding recommendation
Recommendation
Appendix 2
1
Isle of Man Government Small Grants funding 2019/2021
Summary of Project Application and Recommendation for Funding
Charity:
Excellent Development Isle of Man Ltd
Project Title:
Restoring degraded lands to reduce rural poverty in Zimbabwe
Ref No:
SG 0719
Requested Donation:
£83,977
Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding:
468
Cost Per Beneficiary:
£179.44
Details of previous Isle of Man Government funding (past 2 years) YEAR AMOUNT PROJECT TITLE COMMENTS (RE PROJECT DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) 2015 - 2018 £151,219 Creating sustainable lives for people and wildlife. MYG029.15
2017 - 2019 £85,609 Building resilient food and water secure communities in Ukambani, Kenya. SG001.17
Essential Eligibility Criteria for Shortlisting
Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities
Registration Act 1989 or Registered with the UK Charity
Commission
Yes
Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle
of Man or has demonstrated links to the Island
Yes
Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to
operate in the country
Yes
Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index
Zimbabwe – ranked 156
The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations
Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed
SDG6 – Clean water and sanitation
SDG13 – Climate action
SDG15 – Life on land
The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least
10% of total project budget
Yes – Additional funding will be provided through
Guernsey Overseas Aid to fund this project.
Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit
Organisation, if applicable (subject to project location)
Yes
Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and
procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable
adults and children
Yes
Administrative costs are below 10%
Yes
Application includes:
Project Budget
Project Delivery Plan
Risk Assessment
Communications Plan
Safeguarding Plan
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Appendix 2
2
In addition to the above, the External Relations Team assessed each application using the following criteria:
Ranked 1-5
1
Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives
4
2
Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable
5
3
Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed
4
4
The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances
5
5
The charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place
4
6
The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding
5
7
The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects
5
8
The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale
of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager
4
9
A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken
5
10
An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations
4
11
The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding
5
12
The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate
4
13
The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising
awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the
project location and globally.
5
14
The project is deliverable within 24 months
4
63 FSA Ranking
High risk of Terrorist Financing
Project Goals
The overall purpose of the project is to restore degraded lands in 2 micro-catchments in Matebeleland South Province to conserve important natural resources and reduce rural poverty. The key outcomes will be: Local communities have improved water security Reduced soil erosion and restoration of degraded land Reduced deforestation and improved natural regeneration of Mapane woodlands Reduced contamination risk within the catchments and improved hygiene behaviours in the beneficiary communities
Relevant Information
Zimbabwe
Ranked 156 out of 189 on the UN Human Development Index; Zimbabwe is a country which is considered of low human development. Approximately 70% of the population is living below the poverty line.
Following the presidential election there has been a shortage of US dollars which was the currency that the
country adopted to fight hyperinflation. The shortage of US dollars has driven up the price of basic goods.
This has led to the closure of clinics and shortage of fuel. It has also sparked violent protests across the
country and internet shutdowns. This has pushed families into poverty.
Following the unrest in January there is still significant political instability due to shortage of dollars which
may lead to further protests, demonstrations and shutdowns.
There have been no recent reports of unrest or violence since January 2019.
Appendix 2
3 Rationale for Recommendation
The planned activities to achieve the 4 key outcomes are as follows:
Construct 2 sand dams; 1 in each micro-catchment. Up to 40 million litres of water is stored in a
sand dam, protected by sand from evaporation and contamination, providing local people with a
year-round clean water source for domestic, farming and livestock use. Drinking water is accessed
either by gravity to a standpipe or by way of a Rowa hand pump.
Construct gabions/stone silt traps, planting vegetation and pegging and constructing contours.
Training of trainers in environmental conservation.
Establishing community woodlots in each catchment to increase vegetation cover.
Raising awareness of safe water practice through encouraging regular hand washing and keeping
water containers clean.
The application has a detailed project delivery plan with clear activities to achieve the main project outcomes. The charity has experience of delivering similar projects which the Isle of Man Government has funded.
The budget is clear and the charity has a detailed safeguarding policy. The project satisfactorily demonstrates that the proposal meets the SDGs and can be delivered within the timescale.
Recommendation
The External Relations Team recommends that this project be funded.
Appendix 3
1
Isle of Man Government Small Grant funding 2019/2021
Summary of Project Application and Recommendation for Funding
Charity:
CAFOD
Project Title:
Access to clean water using solar power for drought-prone
pastoralist communities in Afar, Ethiopia
Ref No:
SG1714521I
Requested Donation:
£99,000.00
Direct beneficiaries of IOMG Funding:
7387
Cost Per Beneficiary:
£13.40
Details of previous Isle of Man Government Small Grant funding (past 2 years) YEAR AMOUNT PROJECT TITLE COMMENTS (RE PROJECT DELIVERY/ISSUES WITH FINANCES ETC) 2015 £168,836.00 Livelihoods and leadership: tackling gender inequality and sexual violence
Essential Eligibility Criteria for Shortlisting
Is the applicant registered under the Isle of Man Charities
Registration Act 1989?
Yes
Does the applicant have a physical presence on the Isle
of Man?
Yes
Does the applicant have the legal Authority necessary to
operate in the country?
Yes
Country ranking on the UN Human Development Index?
If not Low reason for inclusion detailed
Yes
The applicant specifies at least one of the United Nations
Sustainable Development Goals to be addressed
Yes, SDG6 (clean water and sanitation) and SDG7
(affordable and clean energy)
The applicant has demonstrated ability to raise at least
10% of total project budget
Yes
Is the applicant registered as Specified Non-Profit
Organisation, if applicable?
No (were registered, but advised to de-register)
Does the applicant have safeguarding policies and
procedures in place in relation to safeguarding vulnerable
adults and children?
Yes
Administrative costs are below 10%
Yes
Application includes:
Project Budget
Project Delivery Plan
Risk Assessment
Communications Plan
Safeguarding Plan
Yes to all
Appendix 3
2
In addition to the above, the External Relations Team assessed each application using the following criteria:
Ranked 1-5
1
Project objectives are clear and meet the International Development policy objectives
5
2
Project Delivery Plan is well defined and achievable
4
3
Project costs have been realistically assessed and the project budget is detailed
4
4
The Project Budget demonstrates measures are in place to safeguard charity finances
4
5
The Charity has adequate safeguarding policies in place to protect vulnerable people
5
6
The charity has demonstrated that it can sufficiently manage this level of funding
5
7
The charity has demonstrated a proven record in delivering similar projects
5
8
The charity has sufficient technical expertise to implement the project over a timescale
of two years and has identified an appropriate project manager
5
9
A satisfactory risk assessment has been undertaken
3
10
An appropriate level of due diligence has been conducted on partner organisations
5
11
The project is sustainable post – Isle of Man funding
4
12
The project is technically, environmentally and socially appropriate
if not Low development on UN HDI clear reason why it should be considered
5
13
The Project Communications Plan clearly sets out detailed activities for raising
awareness of the project and Isle of Man Government funding on the Island, in the
project location and globally.
4
14
The project is deliverable within 24 months
4
15
Total
62
FSA Ranking:
Higher risk of money laundering and financing terrorism
Project Goals/ Summary
Objective 1) To improve access to safe and adequate water for drought-prone pastoral communities in Aba’ala district in Afar region, Ethiopia Objective 2) To improve hygiene and sanitation practices among drought-prone pastoral communities in Aba’ala district in Afar region, Ethiopia
Ethiopia
Ethiopia is currently ranked 173 out of 189 countries on the UN Human Development Index. The region is beset by a dearth in infrastructure with some areas having better connection than others.
Relations between Ethiopia and neighbouring Eritrea have recently improved to the point that borders between the two nations opened for the first time in twenty years. The borders were then subsequently closed whilst the two respective governments negotiated terms with regards to duty and visas.
Taking much of the credit for the thawing in relations is the new Ethiopian prime minister, Abiy Ahmed, whom there is a genuine enthusiasm around. His claims for reform in the country is reflected through his record to date as it shows a liberalising of the country’s old autocratic distribution of power and a greater inclusion of women in Ethiopian politics. Moreover, he has so far permitted a greater degree of freedom of speech in the media and the arts.
Rationale for funding recommendation Appendix 3
3 Currently, only 28% of the Aba’ala district has water coverage. For the majority of people living in the region, most of the water available is surface water which is naturally susceptible to disease/ bacteria (the World Health Organisation notes 80% of all diseases in the developing world are water related) and is also only available during the rainy season. As such, many households in the region utilize circa 10 litres of water per day (2 litres per person) which is far below the international average of 5 litres per day. In this sense and whilst CAFOD have not checked the boxes under the UN S
[Response truncated — full text is 77,441 characters]